Not a CBCS member yet? Join now »
CBCS Comics
Not a CBCS member yet? Join now »
CBCS Graded

Mislabeled Ultimate Fallout 4 as Facsimile17447

Collector Bender3455 private msg quote post Address this user
@power_struggle55 I agree, if grading comics was my job, it seems there'd be a simple checklist I follow after grading a book to make sure everything lines up.
Post 26 IP   flag post
Thank you sir. May I have another? Siggy private msg quote post Address this user
Maybe the people making these errors

were

trained

here.
Post 27 IP   flag post
Collector PDGray private msg quote post Address this user
Wow...

just wow...


PDG
Post 28 IP   flag post
Thank you sir. May I have another? Siggy private msg quote post Address this user
Poop happens, and everyone's poop stinks.

It all results in the owner having to resend the slab if they want it fixed. I seriously doubt anyone here ever did so with great big bright heart-warming smiles on their face.

For the record, I'm not against the informative intent of the thread. It's definitely something to look for. And I'll readily admit their poop is runnier these days. This is just a reminder that the same mistakes happen here, and perhaps for the same reasons.
Post 29 IP   flag post
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers).
Splotches is gettin old!
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user
Anyone care to disclose their observations of percentage of errors between the 2 based on their personal submissions?

Everyone makes mistakes, but there's this concept called probabilities.
I use both companies and it is not even close.... not even close from what I have obtained from both.

I have been on the CBCS frustration/anger train for 3 weeks now; and they deserve it.
But the probability and likelihood of a quality delivered product from CBCS is not one of the reasons
Post 30 IP   flag post


Where's his Bat-package? Byrdibyrd private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuffsaid111
Anyone care to disclose their observations of percentage of errors between the 2 based on their personal submissions?

No problem. I have been dealing with both companies for about 3 years now, and I can break down my returns to each one. Check it out.

2019:

CGC returns: 1 (hair in capsule)
CBCS returns: 0

2020:

CGC returns: 2 (1 piece of plastic in capsule, 1 scratches to back of capsule)
CBCS returns: 0

2021:

CGC returns: 14 (13 cracked/damaged slabs, 1 label error)
CBCS returns: 0

2022 (so far):

CGC returns: 13 (1 fibres inside capsule, 1 inner capsule visibly bent, 5 scuffmarks on outer capsule, 6 label errors. And it's only April...)
CBCS returns: 1 (1 cracked slab - I sent an email regarding this issue but have yet to hear back aside from auto-generated reply)

The above single cracked slab constitutes my first and, so far, only return for CBCS. We'll see how things go on that and how much effort I need to put into getting it taken care of. For the record, it took FOUR MONTHS for me to get a response from CGC regarding the returns from 2021 & 2022. I finally received instructions to send all 27 (!!!) returns back about a week ago. It sucked.
Post 31 IP   flag post
Thank you sir. May I have another? Siggy private msg quote post Address this user
@Byrdibyrd How many CGC subs vs CBCS subs in that timeframe?
Post 32 IP   flag post
I don't want to brag, but cashiers are always checking me out. power_struggle55 private msg quote post Address this user
before I knew of Facsmile. Thought I saw a copy of Ultimate Fallout #4 very cheap on ebay (ungraded). seller didnt say it was facsmile but marked it as 4th printing (or whatever it would be technically). I did research. Learned of facsmile knew....still collectable but not worth much. did eventually buy a copy of it (here actually).

point is...Im not a professional. Im not paid to know the difference. people at cgc are.
Post 33 IP   flag post
Where's his Bat-package? Byrdibyrd private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siggy
@Byrdibyrd How many CGC subs vs CBCS subs in that timeframe?


I can only give an approximate answer, but in that timeframe I have submitted around 1200+ books with around 700 going to CGC and around 500 going to CBCS. A lot of the difference is due to me starting out in 2019 with CGC, submitting well over a hundred books to them and only 19 to CBCS.

So I have submitted more books total to CGC (CBCS will catch up - I'm sending them the lion's share now), but that still doesn't account for the ridiculous difference in the number of returns. Seriously, 700/500 does NOT mesh with 30/1.
Post 34 IP   flag post
Where's his Bat-package? Byrdibyrd private msg quote post Address this user
One thing I will say about all the returns I have had from CGC: The giant flood of returns didn't start until December of last year. Up until then, it was negligible - literally 1~2 returns per year, which is pretty good. Then came several submissions in a row with multiple cracked slabs in them, and it was all the same pattern: crack on the right side in the middle or on the left edge near the top left corner. Over a dozen books with the same damage pattern had to be poor materials or a bad change in procedure. Whatever was wrong got fixed because after December I never got another book with a cracked slab like that. The rest of my returns can be chalked up to newbie QC who don't have their acts together yet. I blame efforts to speed things up at CGC and deal with the massive logjam. I appreciate the intentions, but I can't say I approve of the execution.
Post 35 IP   flag post
Collector Bender3455 private msg quote post Address this user
I've submitted somewhere between 50 to 75 books, and this is the 1st time I've gotten an error.
Post 36 IP   flag post
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers).
Splotches is gettin old!
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdibyrd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siggy
@Byrdibyrd How many CGC subs vs CBCS subs in that timeframe?


I can only give an approximate answer, but in that timeframe I have submitted around 1200+ books with around 700 going to CGC and around 500 going to CBCS. A lot of the difference is due to me starting out in 2019 with CGC, submitting well over a hundred books to them and only 19 to CBCS.

So I have submitted more books total to CGC (CBCS will catch up - I'm sending them the lion's share now), but that still doesn't account for the ridiculous difference in the number of returns. Seriously, 700/500 does NOT mesh with 30/1.


Precisely.
Probabilities & Likelihood - it is the answer to everytime someone says "everyone makes mistakes".
Post 37 IP   flag post
Where's his Bat-package? Byrdibyrd private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bender3455
I've submitted somewhere between 50 to 75 books, and this is the 1st time I've gotten an error.

The first time I got a book I needed to return (hair inside a capsule) it came as a total surprise. I had submitted dozens of books and had no problem. That's part of the reason why I really do think a lot of these returns lately is down to the current huge influx of submissions and companies trying out ways to deal with them. Obviously, some ways are more successful than others.
Post 38 IP   flag post
Thank you sir. May I have another? Siggy private msg quote post Address this user
@Byrdibyrd Thanks. The numbers help put it in perspective, and are much easier to accept than "CGC sucks because CBCS doesn't." Especially when so - many - continue to send them books. Seems the best way for people to stop them from making mistakes on their books would be to stop letting them.
Post 39 IP   flag post
Where's his Bat-package? Byrdibyrd private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siggy
@Byrdibyrd Thanks. The numbers help put it in perspective, and are much easier to accept than "CGC sucks because CBCS doesn't." Especially when so - many - continue to send them books. Seems the best way for people to stop them from making mistakes on their books would be to stop letting them.

My pleasure. It's a shame that CGC's efforts to handle all the submissions are not going well, but I also think that people need to know so they can make an informed decision on whether to continue submitting to them while all this is still happening.
Post 40 IP   flag post
Thank you sir. May I have another? Siggy private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdibyrd
My pleasure. It's a shame that CGC's efforts to handle all the submissions are not going well, but I also think that people need to know so they can make an informed decision on whether to continue submitting to them while all this is still happening.

That makes perfect sense. That's why I posted the links- So lurkers/readers (who don't already know) are informed it isn't just CGC that can make a mistake on a book.

I know many think I'm anti-CBCS. Far from it. I've purchased many CBCS slabs, I think the product is just fine, as I do with CGC's product. I want both companies to succeed, because ultimately WE win.

So many posts make it sound like CGC, and only CGC WILL make an error on your order, which, od course, isn't true. If it were, there wouldn't be so many CGC customers on this forum happily showing off their returns.

I think this forum would appear to have more class if the pro-CBCS talk outnumbered the anti-CGC talk.

2c
Post 41 IP   flag post
would be nice to have a snugger fit. Sigur_Ros private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siggy

I think this forum would appear to have more class if the pro-CBCS talk outnumbered the anti-CGC talk.

2c

Not sure a comic book forum needs to worry about anyone's perception of it's level of class, but things might bother you less if you stopped taking the debates so personally.
Post 42 IP   flag post
would be nice to have a snugger fit. Sigur_Ros private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siggy
So many posts make it sound like CGC, and only CGC WILL make an error on your order, which, od course, isn't true. If it were, there wouldn't be so many CGC customers on this forum happily showing off their returns.

I don't ever see anyone say that. We all know the "both sides" argument. I just see a lot of people say CGC is constantly making errors. When CBCS constantly makes errors.. let's talk.

Anyway, here's one someone showed off on the CGC forum..











Post 43 IP   flag post
Where's his Bat-package? Byrdibyrd private msg quote post Address this user
I'd love to have a Marvel Spotlight #32 in 9.8, but not if it looks like that! Dang!
Post 44 IP   flag post
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers).
Splotches is gettin old!
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user
That's a Train.Wreck 10.0
Post 45 IP   flag post
Collector Bender3455 private msg quote post Address this user
So, I got the book back a few days ago. It literally had nothing changed. It was still labeled as a 9.6 Facsimile Edition. I called up CGC, and the very nice lady on the phone said that she could see why it was being resubmitted and that it's extremely unusual that it slipped through a 2nd time, especially as a "Mechanical Error" listing the specific problem. She said all I could do is submit again, but told me she was going to put a note on the book's information. I'm imaging it said something like "WTF guys??", lol. So, book is sent off AGAIN, and then we'll get it back and go from there. Still planning to sell, but I have friends telling me to wait until MCU debut of Miles.
Post 46 IP   flag post
"Forum Overlord" bah ha ha ha... JustThatGuy private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bender3455

Never thought CGC would make these kind of errors.



Tee hee
Post 47 IP   flag post
Where's his Bat-package? Byrdibyrd private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bender3455
So, I got the book back a few days ago. It literally had nothing changed.

Oh, yeah. That sounds like my Strange Academy #1 Walmart edition that will be going back again because they can't seem to deal with the fact that it's a first print and not a second. This will be the THIRD TIME I've sent it back.
Post 48 IP   flag post
Masculinity takes a holiday. EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bender3455
Still planning to sell, but I have friends telling me to wait until MCU debut of Miles.


Are any of these friends Economists? I think that will be like waiting for a lottery ticket to expire. Newsstand in particular is propelled by a bubble of extravagant spending.
Post 49 IP   flag post
" . " Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user
This. Excess savings from stimulus is mostly spent down. Excess net worth from excess speculation (meme stocks and general market) is coming down fast.

The speculative part of the market (the books “north of trend”) is unwinding quickly.

False scarcity is the meme stock equivalent for collectibles.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EbayMafia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bender3455
Still planning to sell, but I have friends telling me to wait until MCU debut of Miles.


Are any of these friends Economists? I think that will be like waiting for a lottery ticket to expire. Newsstand in particular is propelled by a bubble of extravagant spending.
Post 50 IP   flag post
would be nice to have a snugger fit. Sigur_Ros private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bender3455
So, I got the book back a few days ago. It literally had nothing changed. It was still labeled as a 9.6 Facsimile Edition. I called up CGC, and the very nice lady on the phone said that she could see why it was being resubmitted and that it's extremely unusual that it slipped through a 2nd time, especially as a "Mechanical Error" listing the specific problem. She said all I could do is submit again, but told me she was going to put a note on the book's information. I'm imaging it said something like "WTF guys??", lol. So, book is sent off AGAIN, and then we'll get it back and go from there. Still planning to sell, but I have friends telling me to wait until MCU debut of Miles.

I've seen this a number of times on YT. People getting their mech-error books back with no change... or worse errors. Looks on their faces is what it's all about. I selfishly support CGC's enjoyable, horrible QC.
Post 51 IP   flag post
" . " Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user
.
Post 52 IP   flag post
would be nice to have a snugger fit. Sigur_Ros private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puckster
I actually ran across someone selling a mislabel from CGC and advertising it as "rare" and upped the price on it.

Only thing I'd pay extra for is simple, obvious errors like this one. No interest in mislabels.


Post 53 IP   flag post
Where's his Bat-package? Byrdibyrd private msg quote post Address this user
@Sigur_Ros LOL!! That's excellent!
Post 54 IP   flag post
would be nice to have a snugger fit. Sigur_Ros private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrdibyrd
@Sigur_Ros LOL!! That's excellent!

Yeah, I would collect these if I bought graded books and ran across them. Most people get them fixed though.
I think they're great.
Post 55 IP   flag post
622913 56 30
This topic is archived. Start new topic?