Not a CBCS member yet? Join now »
CBCS Comics
Not a CBCS member yet? Join now »

my recent cbcs submission22149

Collector poka private msg quote post Address this user












Post 1 IP   flag post
Collector Bakersman private msg quote post Address this user
Do you feel those are accurate?
Post 2 IP   flag post
I do what I can. TheShocker private msg quote post Address this user
Whats going on?
Post 3 IP   flag post
I'd like to say I still turned out alright, but that would be a lie. flanders private msg quote post Address this user
@poka Did anything you bought from Steve pass?

And is this letter new? I thought in the past they said unable to verify, but now it appears they're going as far as saying it's not authentic.
Post 4 IP   flag post
Collector poka private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakersman
Do you feel those are accurate?


I am pretty confident in the signatures. I have checked them - and although not an expect - they look authentic to me
Post 5 IP   flag post
Collector poka private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheShocker
Whats going on?


Beckett believes the signatures are not authentic and provides same standard letter for all
Post 6 IP   flag post
Collector poka private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by flanders
@poka Did anything you bought from Steve pass?


1 - but I am keeping Steve out of it - because to me the sigs look authentic. So will get them checked by another party
Post 7 IP   flag post
I’m not an ant. I’m a rootin tootin Hornet! Zombie_Head private msg quote post Address this user
It’s just their opinion. I have a Stan Lee I got in person and they couldn’t verify it either. I know it’s real but they couldn’t tell. I wouldn’t get too worked up over it.
Post 8 IP   flag post
I wonder what was on page 12? andy49 private msg quote post Address this user
that's a lot of form letters, none with additional explanations

sorry you wasted your money
Post 9 IP   flag post
We should have the forum rate our packages. HeinzDad private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by flanders
@poka Did anything you bought from Steve pass?

And is this letter new? I thought in the past they said unable to verify, but now it appears they're going as far as saying it's not authentic.
Posted on the day he is “shipping” everyone else’s books.
Post 10 IP   flag post
I've spent years perfecting my brand of assholery. DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user
Maybe JSA will authenticate them. After those smudged Stan Lee signatures, they will probably pass anything.
Post 11 IP   flag post
Collector iamthemaster private msg quote post Address this user
Just a few comments/thoughts:

1. Steve did ship those books out as he said so he kept his word on that end. Hopefully the other books get shipped out as well today.

2. I've seen Stan Lee and Joe Simon signatures and the Ironman 283 and Captain America 213 both look correct/authentic. (I can't say the same about Jack Kirby because I've seen too many different versions so I am not an expert.) What I'm wondering is because of the controversy of this sale, because the sale is from Steve, and/or because the sale happened on the CBCS forum is Beckett choosing to not verify these books and remain impartial? If so, I wish they would have made a comment/statement about it before sending my books over. Hopefully they refunded you on the authentication costs.

3. Was the Fantasy Quarterly an extra book Steve sent? Because it would conveniently be a book not mentioned in this sale and not pictured at all and why CBCS verified it but rejected the others?

4. Also have no idea what the Secrets Behind the Comics signature looks like and wondering if that is also something Steve added on. But coincidentally CBCS chose to not verify any of the Stan Lee, Jack Kirby, or Joe Simon signatures (three dead) and verified the living signature.
Post 12 IP   flag post
I hold the record for itchy trigger finger. sportshort private msg quote post Address this user
Here’s the issue I’m having. Both CBCS and CGC use their own employees as trusted signature witnesses, which makes sense. Given that, why are items purchased from Steve not considered “witnessed”? I understand that he no longer works for CBCS and that they are not obligated to recognize him as a witness. However, it seems reasonable that he—of all people, including current CBCS employees—should be considered a top-tier or “star” witness for these signatures.

If Steve can't be a trusted witness, then no employee of either company should be considered "trusted."

This is jut my opinion.
Post 13 IP   flag post
Collector iamthemaster private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by sportshort
Here’s the issue I’m having. Both CBCS and CGC use their own employees as trusted signature witnesses, which makes sense. Given that, why are items purchased from Steve not considered “witnessed”? I understand that he no longer works for CBCS and that they are not obligated to recognize him as a witness. However, it seems reasonable that he—of all people, including current CBCS employees—should be considered a top-tier or “star” witness for these signatures.

If Steve can't be a trusted witness, then no employee of either company should be considered "trusted."

This is jut my opinion.


Part of a witnessed signature is indicating when the signature took place. Even if Steve got these signatures personally, I doubt he can say with certainty when it happened. That also supposes he was the one who got the signatures when he could have gotten them from a collection.
Post 14 IP   flag post
I've spent years perfecting my brand of assholery. DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user
You are assuming that Steve witnessed the signatures.

If he did, then two things have happened. 1) It is well past the time the books should have been submitted for witnessed signature labels. 2.) The books were sold raw to a third party who has submitted the books themselves and therefore broke the chain of custody.

All that said, I would lean more toward the books being part of acquired collections as opposed to Steve getting the books signed in person and witnessing the signature take place himself.
Post 15 IP   flag post
I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this. GAC private msg quote post Address this user
The integrity of the chain of custody should supersede everything regardless of whose books they belong(ed) to.
Post 16 IP   flag post
I'd like to say I still turned out alright, but that would be a lie. flanders private msg quote post Address this user
Does Beckett still charge for multiple VSP signatures on the same book even if the first one fails and they never have to spend more time trying to verify the next one(s)?
Post 17 IP   flag post
I hold the record for itchy trigger finger. sportshort private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by flanders
Does Beckett still charge for multiple VSP signatures on the same book even if the first one fails and they never have to spend more time trying to verify the next one(s)?


Has that really happened?
Post 18 IP   flag post
I'd like to say I still turned out alright, but that would be a lie. flanders private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by sportshort
Quote:
Originally Posted by flanders
Does Beckett still charge for multiple VSP signatures on the same book even if the first one fails and they never have to spend more time trying to verify the next one(s)?


Has that really happened?


Maybe. It's never happened to me personally, but this thread seems to suggest CBCS didn't issue a refund and even charged an additional $8 fee for rejecting the signature....Specifically post #9

https://forum.cbcscomics.com/topic/19794/page/1/is-there-a-rejection-fee-for-failed-signature-verification/

I thought it was so absurd at the time that it seems to have a permanent place in my brain. Maybe that policy has changed.
Post 19 IP   flag post
Collector poka private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamthemaster
Just a few comments/thoughts:

1. Steve did ship those books out as he said so he kept his word on that end. Hopefully the other books get shipped out as well today.

2. I've seen Stan Lee and Joe Simon signatures and the Ironman 283 and Captain America 213 both look correct/authentic. (I can't say the same about Jack Kirby because I've seen too many different versions so I am not an expert.) What I'm wondering is because of the controversy of this sale, because the sale is from Steve, and/or because the sale happened on the CBCS forum is Beckett choosing to not verify these books and remain impartial? If so, I wish they would have made a comment/statement about it before sending my books over. Hopefully they refunded you on the authentication costs.

3. Was the Fantasy Quarterly an extra book Steve sent? Because it would conveniently be a book not mentioned in this sale and not pictured at all and why CBCS verified it but rejected the others?

4. Also have no idea what the Secrets Behind the Comics signature looks like and wondering if that is also something Steve added on. But coincidentally CBCS chose to not verify any of the Stan Lee, Jack Kirby, or Joe Simon signatures (three dead) and verified the living signature.


3. the fantasy was part of Steve’s sale - not an extra book
4. not part of steve’s sale. got it from somewhere else. the sig is solid


Post 20 IP   flag post
Collector poka private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by flanders
Does Beckett still charge for multiple VSP signatures on the same book even if the first one fails and they never have to spend more time trying to verify the next one(s)?


yes - they charge for all signature - but refund press/grading
Post 21 IP   flag post
Collector iamthemaster private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by poka
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamthemaster
Just a few comments/thoughts:

1. Steve did ship those books out as he said so he kept his word on that end. Hopefully the other books get shipped out as well today.

2. I've seen Stan Lee and Joe Simon signatures and the Ironman 283 and Captain America 213 both look correct/authentic. (I can't say the same about Jack Kirby because I've seen too many different versions so I am not an expert.) What I'm wondering is because of the controversy of this sale, because the sale is from Steve, and/or because the sale happened on the CBCS forum is Beckett choosing to not verify these books and remain impartial? If so, I wish they would have made a comment/statement about it before sending my books over. Hopefully they refunded you on the authentication costs.

3. Was the Fantasy Quarterly an extra book Steve sent? Because it would conveniently be a book not mentioned in this sale and not pictured at all and why CBCS verified it but rejected the others?

4. Also have no idea what the Secrets Behind the Comics signature looks like and wondering if that is also something Steve added on. But coincidentally CBCS chose to not verify any of the Stan Lee, Jack Kirby, or Joe Simon signatures (three dead) and verified the living signature.


3. the fantasy was part of Steve’s sale - not an extra book
4. not part of steve’s sale. got it from somewhere else. the sig is solid




That Stan signature looks legitimate too. Has CBCS changed their policy and refuse to authenticate signatures of the deceased?

Saw this, I guess very few get accepted: https://forum.cbcscomics.com/topic/18412/page/1/does-bas-still-authenticate-stan-lee-signatures/#9
Post 22 IP   flag post
I'd like to say I still turned out alright, but that would be a lie. flanders private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamthemaster
1. Steve did ship those books out as he said so he kept his word on that end. Hopefully the other books get shipped out as well today.


Great news! I wouldn't send them to CBCS given their track record of denying an extremely high percentage of Stan Lee and Jack Kirby signatures. I also saw at least one $1 book on the sales thread with a Stan Lee signature and would say that those are even more unlikely to pass than a book that in itself is worth more than the signature.

There are so many Stan Lee forgeries out there that fraudsters are far more likely to try it on $1 books than books worth hundreds or thousands. I wouldn't blame Beckett for denying every single one of them.
Post 23 IP   flag post
My Chihuahua is watching me in case I do something cool. ICConquest private msg quote post Address this user
@iamthemaster Quote:
Originally Posted by iamthemaster
Just a few comments/thoughts:

1. Steve did ship those books out as he said so he kept his word on that end. Hopefully the other books get shipped out as well today.

@iamthemaster
Could you please send me a link or guide me to where you seen this information. I haven’t heard squat from Steve in around a month despite multiple DM attempts & several email attempts. I am not trying to hijack Poka’s thread, just would like my books or money someday 🤷‍♂️
ICConquest
Post 24 IP   flag post
I'd like to say I still turned out alright, but that would be a lie. flanders private msg quote post Address this user
@ICConquest maybe we can move that discussion here and keep this thread for the vsp program.

It's my fault. I brought Steve up first.

https://forum.cbcscomics.com/topic/22144/page/1/steve-borock/#20
Post 25 IP   flag post
I hold the record for itchy trigger finger. sportshort private msg quote post Address this user
Please welcome me to the club!!!

Both of my submissions for signature authentication, that I purchased from Steve Borock, were rejected. One was Jerry Siegel and the other was Jack Kirby. This both sucks and blows!! Again if you can't trust one of the founders of both CGC and CBCS , then who can you trust? BTW, I don't mean I don't trust him that they are genuine but that CBCs doesn't, is amazing to me. He was a founder of your company, if he's wrong, who's right? He sold them as genuine, so I believe him, but this is really discouraging. I will Probably submit them to CGC and cross my fingers.

GRRRRR!
Post 26 IP   flag post
We should have the forum rate our packages. HeinzDad private msg quote post Address this user
So Lee, Kirby, and Siegel now. I have a theory but I won’t publicly voice it.
Post 27 IP   flag post
I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this. GAC private msg quote post Address this user
@sportshort That really does suck for sure! When you say he sold them as genuine...Do you mean he said he got them signed himself...he saw them being signed or he believes they are genuine?

You have to remember Steve is a comic grader...not a signature authenticator.

I'm sorry those signatures didn't pass.
Post 28 IP   flag post
We should have the forum rate our packages. HeinzDad private msg quote post Address this user
You are correct he isn’t a sig authenticator. Hasn’t he had access to them though? It’s an awful shitty thing to insinuate but the whole thing has been tits up from the get go.

I’m sorry about the hot take but it’s something that has occurred to me and only me.
Post 29 IP   flag post
I hold the record for itchy trigger finger. sportshort private msg quote post Address this user
When I said, “I don’t mean I don’t trust him that they are genuine…,” what I meant was this: logic dictates that if he had purchased the signed items and wasn’t sure of their authenticity, he would have included a disclaimer — something like, “These signatures were not obtained by me, so I cannot guarantee they’re genuine.” He’s a professional, and I can’t believe that if he hadn’t obtained the signatures himself, it never occurred to him that they could be fake. I know for certain that if I were in his position, I would have made that clear.

In his description, he wrote:

“Hey all!
Welcome to my 4th of July sale. Something for everyone!
There will be comics, signed comics, signed graphic novels, vintage 1966 Topps Batman cards, video games, bulk lots, original art, memorabilia, and more!!!”

He’s clearly not new to the business world. I still believe the signatures are genuine, but it seems that CBCS may be unwilling to authenticate them because of the inherent risk — especially with such high-profile signatures that could later, as seen in a recent auction, turn out to be fake.

I still have some faith in Mr. Borock.
Post 30 IP   flag post
652556 45 30
Log in or sign up to compose a reply.