Detective Comics 359 CBCS 9.2 - Trying to figure out the timeline.9681
![]() |
sportshort private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Kav why would they roll the dice? they got a higher grade like they wanted. I think they overestimated the market for restored books and got stung. again, that's the only thing that makes sense. Oh, they could just be crazy, forgot about that possibility. |
||
Post 101 IP flag post |
![]() |
DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
It's the same book cracked out of the CBCS holder, micro-trimmed, color touched, and resubmitted to the cgc hoping they would miss it like they did with the Ewert books years ago. That explains why the submitter to the cgc isn't raising holy hell after losing thousands on a cpr that went completely sideways. | ||
Post 102 IP flag post |
![]() |
sportshort private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Kav still irrelevant. you could not dupe the checkered blemish if you tried for years if not ever. lastly why would you???!!!! |
||
Post 103 IP flag post |
![]() |
Kav private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson Then why wouldnt they resubmit to CBCS hoping they would miss it? |
||
Post 104 IP flag post |
![]() |
sportshort private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson That's what i said! you probably just stated it better. kudos. |
||
Post 105 IP flag post |
![]() |
Kav private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by sportshort Well it's relevant to see if he really has the evidence he is stating-I would like to know what the 'other blemishes' are. |
||
Post 106 IP flag post |
![]() |
sportshort private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Kav overestimated market for restored books. |
||
Post 107 IP flag post |
![]() |
sportshort private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by sportshort as i mentioned it could be a completely different cover the checkerboard stain cannot be duplicated so everything else is moot. |
||
Post 108 IP flag post |
![]() |
Kav private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by sportshort Even though a 5 minute perusal of ebay would clarify this? A collector of 10K books not knowing this? I cant buy that. |
||
Post 109 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Kav because he chose cgc hoping they'd miss it. |
||
Post 110 IP flag post |
![]() |
sportshort private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Kav finally, I agree with you. my theory was the best i could come up with (still the same book). my thinking is that even if he didn't overestimate it (like you believe) he probably figured that CBCS would catch his obvious resto (no reason not to think that) and cut his losses, still expecting to get more that the crap money he got. these are all guesses on my part from the little evidence there is but i have not heard a better theory. |
||
Post 111 IP flag post |
![]() |
Kav private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by sportshort No theories are good but this is the best one. |
||
Post 112 IP flag post |
![]() |
X51 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Kav The white lines at the bottom center to the left of Batgirl's foot. |
||
Post 113 IP flag post |
![]() |
sportshort private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by X51 cannot duplicate the checkerboard stain ever (try it with anything). so no matter what the discrepancies, even if it changed to a 3d cover it is still the same checkerboard stain in both pictures. |
||
Post 114 IP flag post |
![]() |
X51 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson Your theory is the most probable. |
||
Post 115 IP flag post |
![]() |
sportshort private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by X51 hey? that's my theory! i'm hurt... actualy it just validates my theory since we both came to the same conclusion. |
||
Post 116 IP flag post |
![]() |
X51 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by sportshort The nature of the ink stain is identical. We are in agreement on that. We disagree on the possibility that the same ink stain could occur on two books if someone was swiping a stack with a marker at the same time. We also disagree that they are the same book if one has a 3D cover and the other is "not 3D". |
||
Post 117 IP flag post |
![]() |
Kav private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by X51 Um those look like scratches on slab. Hardly some kind of smoking gun. |
||
Post 118 IP flag post |
![]() |
sportshort private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by X51 correct except that if the 3d cover had the same checkerboard with the exactly the same stain allowing the same amount of white to show through the stain (which it does) at least the checkerboard piece would be one and the same (that's the point). therefore in this case SAME BOOK. Sorry fellas I can't play with you guys anymore I gotta get back to work (lunch is over) Had a great time though. Still SAME BOOK. for the record, no hard feelings I like this debate thing. i do admit, I like it better when i'm right. thanks all. |
||
Post 119 IP flag post |
![]() |
X51 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by sportshort I didn't say your theory was wrong. I am simply unwilling to assert it as irrefutable fact based upon the evidence provided. |
||
Post 120 IP flag post |
![]() |
CatmanAmerica private msg quote post Address this user | |
If we assume this to be the same book in both scans ...and in all likelihood it is... then we must address the grading discrepancies and that is where things get dicey. First, we have to be absolutely sure that trimming on this book really exists. The only way to do that is compare it with several other known samples of the same book to determine whether the cut is production or not. Just because a CGC grader claims it’s a trimmed book doesn’t necessarily make it so. Color touch should be much easier to identify without additional comparisons. Also, it’s a grey area for both grading services. If the color touch is very minor, it may sidestep receiving a restored label. Occasionally, very minor color touch or glue can occasionally get a pass as restoration. It’s a judgment call. Over on the CGC boards debate over this book is pretty partisan. It has the appearance of the “aha, gotcha” defensive posturing favoring their grading service over the nearest competition. I made the reasonable argument that no grading service gets it right 100% of the time using the example of CBCS catching slight restoration on a CGC graded book I submitted for cracking and re-encapsulation that had previously received a CGC blue label. Of course I wasn’t happy about receiving the CBCS restored label even though the apparent grade went up slightly. That said, it wasn’t the fault of CBCS that CGC missed the restoration when they graded it earlier. Naturally I felt that even with a slight grade bump the restored label ...however slight... would impact the book’s value by at least 50%. Fortunately, I had the wherewithal to ask if the minor restoration was fixable. It turned out that the restoration could be removed without further damage to the book and with the third re-holder the book ended up receiving a CBCS universal blue label without loss of grade. ![]() ![]() |
||
Post 121 IP flag post |
![]() |
X51 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Kav That too is a valid theory. Without inspecting the book personally, the evidence is inconclusive in my opinion. |
||
Post 122 IP flag post |
![]() |
Kav private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by X51 Yep. We really dont have enough info to go further with this-everything that can be said, has been said. |
||
Post 123 IP flag post |
![]() |
Kav private msg quote post Address this user | |
I hereby summon...THE BEYONDER | ||
Post 124 IP flag post |
![]() |
THE_BEYONDER private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson Elementary my dear.... |
||
Post 125 IP flag post |
![]() Rest in Peace |
Jesse_O private msg quote post Address this user | |
I tend to agree that it is the same book, trimmed and color touched by the buyer, regraded by CGC and sold for a loss. However ... Quote: Originally Posted by Buzzetta If you can look up the notes to get a date, why not share the rest of the notes?? That single factor has me convinced that it is because CGC does not note the grease pen. This whole discussion of "is it the same book or not" is pretty much squashed if they do. So the fact that the notes have not been shared tells me that it is not mentioned. Therefore, did CGC miss something as obvious as a grease pen??? Or was it removed?? I have worked with grease pens in the automotive market and I'm 99.9% positive that chemicals are needed to remove them. If you don't use chemicals, you'd need to do some serious scraping. |
||
Post 126 IP flag post |
![]() |
DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by THE_BEYONDER Nice to see you, Chris. I hope everything is going well for you. Cheers. |
||
Post 127 IP flag post |
![]() |
THE_BEYONDER private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson Miss you too bud ![]() |
||
Post 128 IP flag post |
![]() |
DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by sportshort Sorry. I just skimmed the thread. You're welcome to the credit. |
||
Post 129 IP flag post |
![]() |
sportshort private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson Nope, here's the great thing about coming to the same conclusion independently, It helps validate our theory. thanks! |
||
Post 130 IP flag post |
This topic is archived. Start new topic?