Not a CBCS member yet? Join now »
CBCS Comics
Not a CBCS member yet? Join now »
I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this. GAC private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by drchaos
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomEwan
Maybe people will start selling more on the boards, and stop posting links to their Ebay auctions. I never understood that. Cheaper for both buyer and seller to do it on the boards. PayPal has you protected.


We post links to our ebay books so that people here can PM us with interest so we can give them the book at a discount from the ebay price.

No one is expecting that you actually go through ebay.


Exactly!
Post 26 IP   flag post
I’m not sure they know they’re taking one for the team. Drogio private msg quote post Address this user
No one cared to discuss this back in April.

I’ve been at a disadvantage on eBay for over 3 months now...I still sell ok, but my purchases have gone WAY down. Not because I’ve given up, but because I can’t bid as high as I used to because I have to factor in the tax on my bids...I’m basically waiting for eBay bucks and discount coupons to make big purchases now...the $15/15% discount coupons seem to have completely dried up and the eBay bucks offers at best are 12% (and you have to use the app) and are not frequent at all.

Can’t wait until the majority of states join the insanity so the playing field will be somewhat even again.
Post 27 IP   flag post
Collector Donnied private msg quote post Address this user
Again, the Supreme Court did not create the tax, how hard is that to understand? All they did was not overturn a lower court ruling about the legality of a law, passed by the legislature. It was not a federal law, it was a state law, but since it affected interstate commerce it needed to be clarified. THE LAW WAS PASSED BY DEMOCRATS!
Post 28 IP   flag post
Collector doog private msg quote post Address this user
And declared constitutional by a conservative court, whereas in 1992 a more liberal court decided what was by all accounts the same law was not constitutional. You blame who your personal philosophy allows apparently.
No clarification was necessary, precedent can, and often does rule.
Made it worse, yet again, for the little guy, both sides! EBay buyers and sellers
Post 29 IP   flag post
Collector etapi65 private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnied
Again, the Supreme Court did not create the tax, how hard is that to understand? All they did was not overturn a lower court ruling about the legality of a law, passed by the legislature. It was not a federal law, it was a state law, but since it affected interstate commerce it needed to be clarified. THE LAW WAS PASSED BY DEMOCRATS!
What law?
Not sure to whom you're responding, bust since everything you wrote is wrong.
The states have created these laws. Because of the interstate commerce component; 50 years of Supreme Court ruling precedents were overturned in the current court findings, indicating the states could do this. The particular state in question, South Dakota, is dominant Republican and has been for decades. And it's not close. The current make-up of the state is governor republican, all Senators and reps are republican, attorney general republican. At the state level legislature; senate is 30 R and 5D; state house is 59 R 11D. The justices on the Supreme Court that voted to allow this was 4 conservative justices (including both Trump appointees) and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. So, first, you're wrong...easily, verifiably, wrong. This case creating precedent was a law passed by republicans. BUT IT DOESN'T MATTER, because...Second, even if we picked another state with a different political make-up, they too are working on or have passed similar legislation, both parties in every state are essentially for this tax. They're losing hundreds of millions in tax revenue to online purchases, they want to get that money back. So....stop trying to distort facts to fit your political beliefs. This isn't MSNBC or Foxnews. Stop trying to make this a political fight. This is now state law, in nearly every state, and for those that haven't passed one, you can guarantee if they have a sales tax, this is coming. And the right to levy this tax is being supported by most recent precedent of the highest court, regardless of dominant party in said state and with a split Supreme Court that crosses lines of political appointment. Stop lying to yourself and then trying to pass those lies as fact.
Post 30 IP   flag post


Collector etapi65 private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by doog

Made it worse, yet again, for the little guy, both sides! EBay buyers and sellers


This is actually the biggest take-away. This impacts small, independent businesses and people who may be buying/selling collectibles like the majority of forum users. It massively complicates how to price items and figure out how to get the tax you collect to the appropriate place to cover you're own butt.
Post 31 IP   flag post
Beaten by boat oars Studley_Dudley private msg quote post Address this user
My understanding is that eBay will automatically collect the sales tax on purchases made. That's how I read it through their FAQ page. I know damn well that I won't be looking up tax rates for NY or KY or FL or wherever. Ohio taxes me into the damn ground, so I'm a little surprised they haven't jumped on this yet, but good on the state for raising the gasoline tax. The main thing I know is that the government (local, state, federal - doesn't matter which level) is always going to get its share one way or another.
Post 32 IP   flag post
Collector etapi65 private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Studley_Dudley
My understanding is that eBay will automatically collect the sales tax on purchases made. That's how I read it through their FAQ page. I know damn well that I won't be looking up tax rates for NY or KY or FL or wherever. Ohio taxes me into the damn ground, so I'm a little surprised they haven't jumped on this yet, but good on the state for raising the gasoline tax. The main thing I know is that the government (local, state, federal - doesn't matter which level) is always going to get its share one way or another.
That's what I would hope, but, if you read the link I posted. It talks about you, having to set-up some complicated tax table for use and to "consult a professional tax accountant" to determine if you should do that or not and how. Ebay is only going to do what is the mandatory minimum and otherwise going to pass any organization burden onto the seller.
Post 33 IP   flag post
I had no way of knowing that 9.8 graded copies signed by Adam Hughes weren't what you were looking for. drchaos private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by etapi65
Quote:
Originally Posted by drchaos
Quote:
Originally Posted by etapi65
Quote:
Originally Posted by drchaos
Remember this the next time you vote.

Throw them all out.

This is being done at the state level...so...I'm reading this comment as typically related to national policy. This is the states, wanting to get the sales taxes for goods being sold "in their state", which in this case means to "people in the state".


Inter-state commerce is the domain of the federal government and not the states.

If the US Congress had not passed legislation allowing this nonsense the states would not be allowed to tax those without a physical presence (The Supereme Court decided so in the Quill case).


Please show me where Congress passed a law "allowing" this. Instead, a state, (in this case South Dakota) sought to levy a tax on interstate commerce. The Supreme Court allowed it. It made it to the Supreme Court because of the interstate issues, but there is no Federal law that was passed to "give" the states this ability. Blaming this on "Liberals" or "Conservatives is doubly stupid here. First, the Supreme Court is supposed to be above such labels. Second, since Nixon, the Supreme Court has been 5-4 republican appointees.


Congress had been debating such a bill. If the Us Supreme Court ignored the Quill precedent they have this 100% wrong. As an individual who has never even been to some backwater state I should not be taxed for items sold there online.

Once again the state is going out of its way to screw over small businesses. I can only hope that this gets challenged and the court comes to its senses next time.
Post 34 IP   flag post
If the viagra is working you should be well over a 9.8. xkonk private msg quote post Address this user
Having bought a few things on eBay recently (none of the complainers here have?), the tax is collected and billed separately from your purchase. For example, I won an auction for $19.99. Shipping was $6 and tax was $1.72. I had two hits on my card, one for $25.99 to the seller and one for $1.72 to eBay. From the buyer side at least it looks like eBay is collecting the tax.
Post 35 IP   flag post
I had no way of knowing that 9.8 graded copies signed by Adam Hughes weren't what you were looking for. drchaos private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by xkonk
Having bought a few things on eBay recently (none of the complainers here have?), the tax is collected and billed separately from your purchase. For example, I won an auction for $19.99. Shipping was $6 and tax was $1.72. I had two hits on my card, one for $25.99 to the seller and one for $1.72 to eBay. From the buyer side at least it looks like eBay is collecting the tax.


EBay collecting the tax makes a big difference. Having to file returns to 50 states monthly or quarterly is enough to put small sellers out of business
Post 36 IP   flag post
Captain Accident the420bandito private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by xkonk
Having bought a few things on eBay recently (none of the complainers here have?), the tax is collected and billed separately from your purchase. For example, I won an auction for $19.99. Shipping was $6 and tax was $1.72. I had two hits on my card, one for $25.99 to the seller and one for $1.72 to eBay. From the buyer side at least it looks like eBay is collecting the tax.


I have noticed this as well. I sold an item to someone in NY last month and the tax was automatically add to the invoice I sent.

A few purchases I made also had it built in when I checked out recently.

Blame Amazon lol.
Post 37 IP   flag post
Collector KYoung_1974 private msg quote post Address this user
It was only a matter of time for the archaic tax systems to catch up with technology. Technically, in my state, you are supposed to pay sales tax on every purchase, a "use tax" they call it. If the merchant didn't collect the tax, you are supposed to declare it and mail it in yourself. With online shopping, nobody was doing this, so here we are. Amazon started collecting in my state, year before last I believe and Ebay just started in July...
Post 38 IP   flag post
Collector Enelson private msg quote post Address this user
It blows...I understand why taxes exist, however, the fact that I am now paying tax on purchases because I live in NJ isn't fair to others who aren't...

And ebay is automatically collecting sales tax from my buyers as well
Post 39 IP   flag post
Collector moodswing private msg quote post Address this user
Hey Ebay and the Gov't!!! I already paid sales tax when I bought the item initially, leave me alone
Post 40 IP   flag post
651437 40 15
This topic is archived. Start new topic?