9.8 grading?8092
![]() |
moodswing private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Drogio I would slab it so I have to decide if it would be financially beneficial to raw->slab or just buy 9.6 or 9.8. 9.6 are around mid fifties. Figure about $30 to slab so probably just be better to get one already slabbed. |
||
Post 26 IP flag post |
![]() |
Instant_Subtitles private msg quote post Address this user | |
@moodswing Sorry for being late to this game. 2018 has been very rough on my soul. But that is a story for another time. In the case of grading, certain minor defects can be excused if there is proof it has happened during publication. Otherwise the grade of a 9.6 (or lower) will be given if the damage appears to be done during shipping, handling, and other factors at hand. The 'proof' is that one factor many (including myself) tend to forget when looking for that one specific comic that can pass off as a definite 9.8. However... The negative reviews against the seller generally point out that they do 'over-grade' their comics. And based on the lack of information on why they say it is said grade, that is something worth noting. Because defects aside, this specific issue passes as being no higher than a 9.6. Why a 9.6? Lets presume that there is no discoloration, no color break, and no sign of it being read. The average professional grader would allow it to be a 9.8 at the very highest IF the comic had only one known factory defect. This has two to three shown. Defect #1: The obvious knock on the upper right corner. Lets just presume that it is a factory defect and nothing more. (And personally, I have sold off comics with a loss because I cannot accept a 9.8 with that type of defect.) Defect #2: The staple on the bottom of the comic. It should show that portion of the comic was not stapled in properly, hence the illusion it has a roll-like defect going on. Defect #3: The way it was printed. There is virtually no sign that there is damage. But there are signs that it was printed incorrectly, cut incorrectly, yet put together correctly. So unless the specific grader decides that 2-3 factory defects make this issue qualify for a flat NM (9.4) grade, it would grade more like a NM+ (9.6). And only because there are no additional pre-shipment defects worth noting. Or, at least, in the regards to the actual product and not the photos that the seller is currently offering. |
||
Post 27 IP flag post |
![]() |
KeepItClunky private msg quote post Address this user | |
Not saying it was the case with the Teen Titans book the OP started the thread with, but I think it's important to point out that sometimes damage occurs during the encapsulation process. Ive seen this happen a few times. | ||
Post 28 IP flag post |
![]() |
Instant_Subtitles private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by KeepItClunky I had experiences with QC when I purchased the following CGC graded comics: - NYX #3 (9.8) - Pieces of their anti-acid paper was on the comic cover; no clue if it was also the case on the top right side of the issue as well. - All-New Wolverine #1 (action figure variant) (9.8) - Good size knock on the top left corner of the comic. It made me feel that it should have been graded a 9.6. No clue about Star Wars: Darth Vader #3 (9.8). I sold that for a loss because I did not like how it was slabbed in crooked. |
||
Post 29 IP flag post |
![]() |
Darryl_H private msg quote post Address this user | |
It would depend on the corner and the rest of the comic | ||
Post 30 IP flag post |
![]() |
X51 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by esaravo You hold a device up to the paint. It shoots a laser at the surface at one of three specified angles and spits out a value. The surface has to be relatively flat. To operate a service, you'd need to some kind of configuration where you were not making contact with the comic itself. Otherwise you'd risk damaging it. I think it's feasible, but the bugs would have to be worked out. |
||
Post 31 IP flag post |
This topic is archived. Start new topic?