CGC Crossover Service (no delete)7556
![]() |
RyanHicks private msg quote post Address this user | |
There have been a couple threads started on this and deleted but it looks like Ricketts and Jesse have decided to allow it to stay.![]() Here is the Original email from CGC, feel free to discuss but please keep it civil so the discussion doesn't get actually deleted: Quote: Originally Posted by CGC_Email |
||
Post 1 IP flag post |
![]() |
moodswing private msg quote post Address this user | |
Get those pgx books in. | ||
Post 2 IP flag post |
![]() |
BabaLament private msg quote post Address this user | |
That’s what I said. Nobody is going to take nice, clean CBCS slabs in to get Newton rings. However, to take a book from PGX resale value (term used loosely) to CGC resale value is a no-brainer. | ||
Post 3 IP flag post |
![]() |
Batman79 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Couldn't help but notice that the cgc price at baltimore comic con shot up to $30 a book! Now that's something to talk about. Geezus! | ||
Post 4 IP flag post |
![]() |
Thanatos private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by BabaLament Debateable. Bye bye Rivet label! |
||
Post 5 IP flag post |
![]() |
moodswing private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Batman79 What was it before? Must be taking advantage of the uptick in customers. |
||
Post 6 IP flag post |
![]() |
Batman79 private msg quote post Address this user | |
$28 I believe | ||
Post 7 IP flag post |
![]() |
RyanHicks private msg quote post Address this user | |
As much as I don't want to admit it, this was a smart business move on CGC's part. They are taking advantage of a currently (perceived) hurting competitors weakness. CBCS did the same type of move when CGC was going through their slab fiasco a couple years ago. This is exactly why competition is good and the end consumer always benefits from healthy competition! | ||
Post 8 IP flag post |
![]() |
Batman79 private msg quote post Address this user | |
The CBCS staff at baltimore were awesome as always!! $18 vs $30 IS A NO BRAINER! | ||
Post 9 IP flag post |
![]() |
IcantfindwhatIwant private msg quote post Address this user | |
CBC is making a smart move here. For anybody on the fence about which service to use, this might be enough to sway them. For some people It’s about the options provided by the grading service, which is what brought me to CBCS in the first place (signature verification was big). If they permanently add this to their arsenal, it could be a strong case for people choosing their brand. Especially for people like me who need all their cases to be the same...so they stack nicely...and look neat. | ||
Post 10 IP flag post |
![]() |
KingNampa private msg quote post Address this user | |
This is all a conspiracy by CGC to change the conversations away from the main topic today! They want to hide the fact that Venom the Movie sucks hard!! Conspiracy I say!!! | ||
Post 11 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
CGC play dirty pool and I'm not talking about this Crossover promo. Newton rings are here to stay as well for them it seems. CBCS is the grading company that will win out in the end. They are simply the superior company in almost ever way. The fact that CBCS even allows a thread like this is an indication of their openness, acceptance and transperancy. |
||
Post 12 IP flag post |
![]() |
kaptainmyke private msg quote post Address this user | |
SUPERIOR OPTICS brah | ||
Post 13 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
optics for all intents and purposes is reality. | ||
Post 14 IP flag post |
![]() |
Drogio private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by GAC They may be superior in quality, but they will still lose out to better customer service and turn around times. I bet 95% of the consumers out there weighing between cgc, pgx and cbcs don't know about Newton rings...and 80% probably wouldn't care if you explained it to them. But pertaining to the offer it does nothing for me unless I want to convert a cbcs slab to cgc to make a better profit on a sale...likely not worth the investment even if cgc sells,for slightly more. |
||
Post 15 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Drogio I get what you're saying but for me, I am not a dealer, I'm a collector. I dont buy from CBCS because of their TATs. I buy because everything about their product is superior. TATs, to me mean very little. Ofcourse, given the choice between short and long TATs, I'll pick short but long TATs are not enough to make me switch. I'm not buying TATs...I'm buying superior grading, slabs, VSP service, pressing etc. If this takes longer, so be it. I'm not sure about your #'s (95% and 80%) but if people care about their collections like I do then in my opinion there's really no choice you have to choose CBCS. |
||
Post 16 IP flag post |
![]() |
KingNampa private msg quote post Address this user | |
@GAC could you please clarify what specifically is superior? | ||
Post 17 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
more consistent/accurate grading, chrystal clear slabs. | ||
Post 18 IP flag post |
![]() |
KingNampa private msg quote post Address this user | |
@GAC Thank you | ||
Post 19 IP flag post |
![]() |
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
I wouldn’t blame CBCS for not allowing this to be promoted on their website (I’m considering the forums as part of their website). Allowing it’s not the wisest decision, I suppose it’s speaks to their belief in their product. | ||
Post 20 IP flag post |
![]() |
Studley_Dudley private msg quote post Address this user | |
I'm not exactly surprised that CGC has decided to throw this out there, but the timing of it is interesting. Now that the perceived weakness in CBCS (TAT, customer service, not rescuing puppies from a burning building, etc) are very public, it seems an aggressive move. Their pricing sucks ass, and "superior optics" is quite the stretch. However, with the current state of affairs at CBCS, who can blame CGC for putting this out? I'm a collector first, so the TAT doesn't really bother me too much. What does bother me is the lack of customer service. Look, I like CBCS. I've been using the service since 2015, but damn. It went to heck the year I was in the sandbox. It's a bold move, but I don't know how many people will take advantage. I took advantage of CBCS' offer of reslabbing after CGC's slab fiasco. There isn't a slab fiasco at CBCS as far I know, and PGX is still PGX. My hope, as it has been, is that CBCS will un-f**k themselves and get it together is the very near future because I would like to see them succeed. Even my rivet label slabs would just go back to CBCS for a reholder with the more slightly label. I don't need to play the re-grade game with them. Semi-tangent over. Post coming to new to the collection thread soon. |
||
Post 21 IP flag post |
![]() |
IcantfindwhatIwant private msg quote post Address this user | |
Newton rings are the ultimate dealbreaker for CGC. I feel if the consistency of these was more well known they would lose a lot of business. Why trade in a clear case for the risk? | ||
Post 22 IP flag post |
![]() |
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Studley_Dudley You’re prob right, CGC smells blood and thinks this could be a killshot. It’s not. |
||
Post 23 IP flag post |
![]() |
DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck I agree. Anyone who sends in a slab from CBCS to the cgc to be regraded probably isn't going to submit anything to CBCS any way. I have bought several CBCS 9.6s lately because 9.6s from CBCS or the cgc are a lot cheaper than their 9.8 counterparts. I have found that the the 9.6s from CBCS look fantastic. I have 9.8s (bought at a 9.8 price) from the cgc that don't look as nice as the CBCS 9.6s. I'm sure other collectors have experienced just the opposite, but I have no complaints. Newton rings and the puddling in the back inner well of the cgc cases are complete deal breakers. The puddling actually damages the book and requires a press to repair. |
||
Post 24 IP flag post |
![]() |
Drogio private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by IcantfindwhatIwant Quote: Originally Posted by kaptainmyke |
||
Post 25 IP flag post |
![]() |
kaptainmyke private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Drogio |
||
Post 26 IP flag post |
![]() |
rickdod3 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Batman79 $18 isn't a bad deal, plus that's $1 for every month you'll have to wait to get your books back lol |
||
Post 27 IP flag post |
![]() |
Studley_Dudley private msg quote post Address this user | |
Lol | ||
Post 28 IP flag post |
![]() |
SpiderTim private msg quote post Address this user | |
CBCS rules! What I am wishing is that slap that CGC is going for will force CBCS to once again resume the great customer service it was once known for! And TAT's need to be improved upon I still remember when CGC also took 6 months to grade your books but they got over that so CBCS should also get over it! Then all of our lives will be perfect with CBCS! | ||
Post 29 IP flag post |
![]() |
the420bandito private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by moodswing I have 5-6 pgx slabs waiting just for this moment. ![]() |
||
Post 30 IP flag post |
This topic is archived. Start new topic?