Got My First Submission Back Today | CBCS Comics

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedOne1944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scorpion
grading is subjectable, that why grading is a crock of S***. if you were to break that GSX out and send it back, it may not come back with the same 9.6 that why some people buy low grade books 9.2 9.4 and break them out and send them back in and get a higher grading. but this is what it is now,

#1 I agree that people do crack and re-submit books.

#2 I disagree that 9.2 & 9.4 are low grade books.

#3 You failed to mention that those "Low Grade" 9.2 9.4 Books run just as good of chance as coming back with lower, not higher grades.

Its a slippery slope, but its the only game in town.

exactly! I sold a guy a ASM300 9.4 ...he had it cracked by CGC at con...signed and regraded..came back a 8.5.

I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this. 77.28K	77.28K GAC private msg quote post Address this user	plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 0
	Quote: Originally Posted by Foghorn_Sam Quote: Originally Posted by GAC Quote: Originally Posted by DWeeB1967 @GAC Blue slab. It simply had a comment staying that the words "Dave Cockrum" on the first page. That makes sense then, CGC was accounting for the signature as a defect in their 9.2 grade. CBCSs verified signature does not count as a defect, hence their higher grade. A welcomed surprise I'm sure. Congrats on that!!! Not always true. I had a FF #62 signed by Jack Kirby below the indicia that was a CGC blue label 9.0, came back from CBCS with the verified red label as a 9.0. I guess you have to allow for some variance in the grading sometimes as DweeB1967 and Watcher experienced. That's very true for sure but in this particular instance it's likely the signature contributed to a lower CGC grade whereas not at all for CBCSs verified sig grade.
	6 years ago	Post 36 • IP flag post

I'm a #2. 11.57K	11.57K BigRedOne1944 private msg quote post Address this user	plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 2
	Quote: Originally Posted by Scorpion grading is subjectable, that why grading is a crock of S***. if you were to break that GSX out and send it back, it may not come back with the same 9.6 that why some people buy low grade books 9.2 9.4 and break them out and send them back in and get a higher grading. but this is what it is now, #1 I agree that people do crack and re-submit books. #2 I disagree that 9.2 & 9.4 are low grade books. #3 You failed to mention that those "Low Grade" 9.2 9.4 Books run just as good of chance as coming back with lower, not higher grades. Its a slippery slope, but its the only game in town.
	6 years ago	Post 26 • IP flag post

COLLECTOR 3.77K	3.77K Foghorn_Sam private msg quote post Address this user	plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 1
	I guess it comes down to who do you trust more about the grade of a comic; the local comic shop dealer, ebay-craigslist seller, etc or an official 3rd party grader like CBCS or CGC? I think the verdict has already been rendered.
	6 years ago	Post 27 • IP flag post

Collector 4.17K	4.17K Watcher private msg quote post Address this user	plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 0
	Quote: Originally Posted by BigRedOne1944 Quote: Originally Posted by Scorpion grading is subjectable, that why grading is a crock of S***. if you were to break that GSX out and send it back, it may not come back with the same 9.6 that why some people buy low grade books 9.2 9.4 and break them out and send them back in and get a higher grading. but this is what it is now, #1 I agree that people do crack and re-submit books. #2 I disagree that 9.2 & 9.4 are low grade books. #3 You failed to mention that those "Low Grade" 9.2 9.4 Books run just as good of chance as coming back with lower, not higher grades. Its a slippery slope, but its the only game in town. exactly! I sold a guy a ASM300 9.4 ...he had it cracked by CGC at con...signed and regraded..came back a 8.5.
	6 years ago	Post 28 • IP flag post

You do know that the new guy brings the donuts, right? 12.82K	12.82K DWeeB1967 private msg quote post Address this user	plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 0
	Thanks, @GAC. Yep that's all I can figure. I'll absolutely take it.
	6 years ago	Post 32 • IP flag post

Beaten by boat oars 52.63K	52.63K Studley_Dudley private msg quote post Address this user	plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 2
	Quote: Originally Posted by Scorpion grading is subjectable, that why grading is a crock of S***. if you were to break that GSX out and send it back, it may not come back with the same 9.6 that why some people buy low grade books 9.2 9.4 and break them out and send them back in and get a higher grading. but this is what it is now, Lighten up, Francis.
	6 years ago	Post 33 • IP flag post

Captain Corrector 6.12K	6.12K CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user	plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 0
	@DWeeB1967 What was the CGC Certification number of the GSX #1 9.2? Maybe one of us here can check the Grader’s notes.
	6 years ago	Post 35 • IP flag post

Got My First Submission Back Today7273