Originally Posted by Logan510 More flies with honey than with vinegar, just sayin'.
Who wants to catch flies...?
Better life with honesty than telling people what they want to hear, just sayin'.
Question then if life is better with honesty wouldn't living life with full disclosure be better then good faith?
Those shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
Maybe but if something is sold in good faith information can be held back and it would still be in good faith. If something is sold with full disclosure and something is held out it is now deception. Two different ways to treat "honesty"
You're going to have to carefully and logically explain how anything is being "held out" when a person has a raw comic in front of them that they can completely inspect for themselves. The comic is fully disclosed, right there. What someone else's opinion of the comic's condition may have been...even a professional one...is immaterial to the transaction.
Originally Posted by Logan510 More flies with honey than with vinegar, just sayin'.
Who wants to catch flies...?
Better life with honesty than telling people what they want to hear, just sayin'.
Question then if life is better with honesty wouldn't living life with full disclosure be better then good faith?
Those shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
Maybe but if something is sold in good faith information can be held back and it would still be in good faith. If something is sold with full disclosure and something is held out it is now deception. Two different ways to treat "honesty"
You're going to have to carefully and logically explain how anything is being "held out" when a person has a raw comic in front of them that they can completely inspect for themselves. The comic is fully disclosed, right there. What someone else's opinion of the comic's condition may have been...even a professional one...is immaterial to the transaction.
If it's immaterial then why would only one portion of immaterial data be brought into the mix. Answer it helps with the sales pitch yes?
Originally Posted by Logan510 More flies with honey than with vinegar, just sayin'.
Who wants to catch flies...?
Better life with honesty than telling people what they want to hear, just sayin'.
Question then if life is better with honesty wouldn't living life with full disclosure be better then good faith?
Those shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
Maybe but if something is sold in good faith information can be held back and it would still be in good faith. If something is sold with full disclosure and something is held out it is now deception. Two different ways to treat "honesty"
For some people, honesty seems to be just a hoop to jump through.
Originally Posted by Logan510 More flies with honey than with vinegar, just sayin'.
Who wants to catch flies...?
Better life with honesty than telling people what they want to hear, just sayin'.
Question then if life is better with honesty wouldn't living life with full disclosure be better then good faith?
Those shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
Maybe but if something is sold in good faith information can be held back and it would still be in good faith. If something is sold with full disclosure and something is held out it is now deception. Two different ways to treat "honesty"
For some people, honesty seems to be just a hoop to jump through.
Originally Posted by Logan510 More flies with honey than with vinegar, just sayin'.
Who wants to catch flies...?
Better life with honesty than telling people what they want to hear, just sayin'.
Question then if life is better with honesty wouldn't living life with full disclosure be better then good faith?
Those shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
Maybe but if something is sold in good faith information can be held back and it would still be in good faith. If something is sold with full disclosure and something is held out it is now deception. Two different ways to treat "honesty"
You're going to have to carefully and logically explain how anything is being "held out" when a person has a raw comic in front of them that they can completely inspect for themselves. The comic is fully disclosed, right there. What someone else's opinion of the comic's condition may have been...even a professional one...is immaterial to the transaction.
Then why even bother showing the potential buyer the 9.0 label?
Originally Posted by Logan510 More flies with honey than with vinegar, just sayin'.
Who wants to catch flies...?
Better life with honesty than telling people what they want to hear, just sayin'.
Question then if life is better with honesty wouldn't living life with full disclosure be better then good faith?
Those shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
Maybe but if something is sold in good faith information can be held back and it would still be in good faith. If something is sold with full disclosure and something is held out it is now deception. Two different ways to treat "honesty"
You're going to have to carefully and logically explain how anything is being "held out" when a person has a raw comic in front of them that they can completely inspect for themselves. The comic is fully disclosed, right there. What someone else's opinion of the comic's condition may have been...even a professional one...is immaterial to the transaction.
Then why even bother showing the potential buyer the 9.0 label?
This has already been explained, multiple times. Further discussion about this is just going in circles. Please see post #289 in this thread for a full explanation. Thank you.
Originally Posted by Logan510 More flies with honey than with vinegar, just sayin'.
Who wants to catch flies...?
Better life with honesty than telling people what they want to hear, just sayin'.
Question then if life is better with honesty wouldn't living life with full disclosure be better then good faith?
Those shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
Maybe but if something is sold in good faith information can be held back and it would still be in good faith. If something is sold with full disclosure and something is held out it is now deception. Two different ways to treat "honesty"
You're going to have to carefully and logically explain how anything is being "held out" when a person has a raw comic in front of them that they can completely inspect for themselves. The comic is fully disclosed, right there. What someone else's opinion of the comic's condition may have been...even a professional one...is immaterial to the transaction.
Then why even bother showing the potential buyer the 9.0 label?
This has already been explained, multiple times. Further discussion about this is just going in circles. Please see post #289 in this thread for a full explanation. Thank you.
I've read that post. Doesn't change the deception that took place or the hoops being jumped through to try and justify it.
Originally Posted by Logan510 More flies with honey than with vinegar, just sayin'.
Who wants to catch flies...?
Better life with honesty than telling people what they want to hear, just sayin'.
Question then if life is better with honesty wouldn't living life with full disclosure be better then good faith?
Those shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
Maybe but if something is sold in good faith information can be held back and it would still be in good faith. If something is sold with full disclosure and something is held out it is now deception. Two different ways to treat "honesty"
You're going to have to carefully and logically explain how anything is being "held out" when a person has a raw comic in front of them that they can completely inspect for themselves. The comic is fully disclosed, right there. What someone else's opinion of the comic's condition may have been...even a professional one...is immaterial to the transaction.
Then why even bother showing the potential buyer the 9.0 label?
This has already been explained, multiple times. Further discussion about this is just going in circles. Please see post #289 in this thread for a full explanation. Thank you.
I disagree with your opinion, please explain more...
Originally Posted by Logan510 More flies with honey than with vinegar, just sayin'.
Who wants to catch flies...?
Better life with honesty than telling people what they want to hear, just sayin'.
Question then if life is better with honesty wouldn't living life with full disclosure be better then good faith?
Those shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
Maybe but if something is sold in good faith information can be held back and it would still be in good faith. If something is sold with full disclosure and something is held out it is now deception. Two different ways to treat "honesty"
You're going to have to carefully and logically explain how anything is being "held out" when a person has a raw comic in front of them that they can completely inspect for themselves. The comic is fully disclosed, right there. What someone else's opinion of the comic's condition may have been...even a professional one...is immaterial to the transaction.
Then why even bother showing the potential buyer the 9.0 label?
This has already been explained, multiple times. Further discussion about this is just going in circles. Please see post #289 in this thread for a full explanation. Thank you.
I've read that post. Doesn't change the deception that took place or the hoops being jumped through to try and justify it.
Originally Posted by Logan510 More flies with honey than with vinegar, just sayin'.
Who wants to catch flies...?
Better life with honesty than telling people what they want to hear, just sayin'.
Question then if life is better with honesty wouldn't living life with full disclosure be better then good faith?
Those shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
Maybe but if something is sold in good faith information can be held back and it would still be in good faith. If something is sold with full disclosure and something is held out it is now deception. Two different ways to treat "honesty"
You're going to have to carefully and logically explain how anything is being "held out" when a person has a raw comic in front of them that they can completely inspect for themselves. The comic is fully disclosed, right there. What someone else's opinion of the comic's condition may have been...even a professional one...is immaterial to the transaction.
Then why even bother showing the potential buyer the 9.0 label?
This has already been explained, multiple times. Further discussion about this is just going in circles. Please see post #289 in this thread for a full explanation. Thank you.
I've read that post. Doesn't change the deception that took place or the hoops being jumped through to try and justify it.
Originally Posted by Logan510 More flies with honey than with vinegar, just sayin'.
Who wants to catch flies...?
Better life with honesty than telling people what they want to hear, just sayin'.
Question then if life is better with honesty wouldn't living life with full disclosure be better then good faith?
Those shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
Maybe but if something is sold in good faith information can be held back and it would still be in good faith. If something is sold with full disclosure and something is held out it is now deception. Two different ways to treat "honesty"
You're going to have to carefully and logically explain how anything is being "held out" when a person has a raw comic in front of them that they can completely inspect for themselves. The comic is fully disclosed, right there. What someone else's opinion of the comic's condition may have been...even a professional one...is immaterial to the transaction.
Then why even bother showing the potential buyer the 9.0 label?
This has already been explained, multiple times. Further discussion about this is just going in circles. Please see post #289 in this thread for a full explanation. Thank you.
I've read that post. Doesn't change the deception that took place or the hoops being jumped through to try and justify it.
Great. Can we move on, now...?
Conversely, shall we stay on this point...? I don't think you proved your point yet.
Yes, that's what's called a private message. I thought it was pretty self-explanatory, but I'll rearrange the words, if that will help: All these "cats with yarn" pictures are pretty hardcore trolling you're doing. Eventually, the mods will notice.
Yes, that's what's called a private message. All these "cats with yarn" pictures are pretty hardcore trolling you're doing. Eventually, the mods will notice.
Yes, that's what's called a private message. I thought it was pretty self-explanatory, but I'll rearrange the words, if that will help: All these "cats with yarn" pictures are pretty hardcore trolling you're doing. Eventually, the mods will notice.
PS. I don't mind posting private messages, but there are a TON BUNCH of people who get REALLLLLLLY upset when private messages are posted. You might want to watch out for them.
Yes, that's what's called a private message. All these "cats with yarn" pictures are pretty hardcore trolling you're doing. Eventually, the mods will notice.
I disagree with your point and offer the opposite argument.
Yes, that's what's called a private message. All these "cats with yarn" pictures are pretty hardcore trolling you're doing. Eventually, the mods will notice.
I disagree with your point and offer the opposite argument.
Who's on first...?
@DocBrown All these "cats with yarn" pictures you are posting are pretty hardcore trolling. Eventually, the mods will notice.
I'm not really sure what people are arguing about. Sorta makes me wish for the good old days, when lots of boardies on a thread about grading companies would bash PGX, offer vague criticisms of CGC and sing the praises of CBCS
Collector
Collector
COLLECTOR
Collector
Ima gonna steal this and look for some occasion to use it!