Wolverine #80 X-23 Debunked?3319
COLLECTOR | JLS_Comics private msg quote post Address this user | |
We're talking about 23 pairs of chromosomes and the "23" coming up on a vial in a genetics lab. It's not all the surprising that this number would come up more than once over a decade or so. Wolverine 80 came out in what? 1994? and then Innocence lost was like 10 years later (I say IL because not much was told about her in NYX). The number 23 makes sense for a character like this | ||
Post 51 IP flag post |
COLLECTOR | DarthLego private msg quote post Address this user | |
She was the 23rd attempt at cloning Logan, her name has nothing to do with chromosomes. Hence bad Logan is X-24. | ||
Post 52 IP flag post |
COLLECTOR | JLS_Comics private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DarthLego It's true on the 23rd attempt but it dealt with a duplicated x chromosome and made a female instead of a male. They "Y" chromosome kept disintegrating that's why Dr Kinney took an "X" chromosome on that last attempt |
||
Post 53 IP flag post |
Collector | Ambaryerno private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by shrewbeer In this case it's important because you're talking about something that people are using to inflate the value of what's otherwise a comic that has no real significance. It has...Cyber. And a few plot points that contribute nothing to the grand scheme of things. So Wolverine #80 isn't particularly iconic or meaningful. Tack on an, "Oh, but it's technically the first appearance of X-23" and it's going to add a few bucks on eBay. And now, even if the "X-23 Appearance/Mention" IS removed from the CBCS grading, it's STILL going to get interest from collectors just from the controversy this has caused. The latter I'm fine with, but advertising it as something it's NOT is a problem. Kyle himself openly discourages X-23 collectors from picking this issue up for that very reason. Quote: Originally Posted by DarthLego Quote: Originally Posted by JLS_Comics She's specifically the 23rd attempt at a FEMALE clone ("X" refers to "X chromosome," not "Weapon X". In Innocence Lost several male cloning attempts fail before Sarah Kinney proposes the female clone. When she defies her orders and begins the attempt to create the female we see her make an entry on her computer to the effect of "X Chromosome Trial 1. A second entry is shown later with X Chromosome Trial 17. Then finally we get Trial 23, which is successful. So there were 22 attempts at the female BEFORE Laura was successfully conceived. This one is also confirmed by Kyle. |
||
Post 54 IP flag post |
COLLECTOR | JLS_Comics private msg quote post Address this user | |
Yup and as a punishment for defying Rice's orders she was forced to carry the baby to full term | ||
Post 55 IP flag post |
COLLECTOR | DarthLego private msg quote post Address this user | |
And you believe they stopped on 23 being the success completely by coincidence? |
||
Post 56 IP flag post |
COLLECTOR | DarthLego private msg quote post Address this user | |
Also, someone seems to have a desire to crash the #80 market. #followthemoneytrail |
||
Post 57 IP flag post |
Collector | Ambaryerno private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DarthLego Cheeky images don't change the fact that life is chock full of coincidences whatever your spiritual beliefs may say, because *I* sure as @#$% don't share them. If Kyle says it's a coincidence, it's a coincidence. I don't automatically assume someone is lying just to neatly force the world to fit my views. |
||
Post 58 IP flag post |
COLLECTOR | shrewbeer private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Ambaryerno |
||
Post 59 IP flag post |
COLLECTOR | DarthLego private msg quote post Address this user | |
Synchronicity rules the universe, not coincidence. |
||
Post 60 IP flag post |
Collector* | Towmater private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Ambaryerno |
||
Post 61 IP flag post |
This topic is archived. Start new topic?