The cgc Raise Prices Effective January 21, 202521443
![]() |
KatKomics private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Nuffsaid111 I'll have to dig in my MCS data. I've only ever sold a handful of raw books through MCS but I remember in particular the Star Wars issue with 1st appearance of Thrawn. The raw copy at a lower grade than my other 2 graded copies sold for substantially more - was crazy. Now there is a caveat The raw as it didn't need grading was sold before Thrawn turned a disappointing appearance in whatever the show was he was in and the graded were sold just as turd of a show was streaming - so probably the raw was during the hype and the graded were hurt by Disney management of a dead IP The graded if I remember did go for approximate FMV |
||
Post 76 IP flag post |
![]() |
KatKomics private msg quote post Address this user | |
Just an observation/rant/venting... People complain about a % difference in realized prices for different grading companies....does it really matter?? why and to whom and when does it matter?? Any book with FMV at less than say $100 is not worth even grading (you can sell for less than FMV and still be ahead for having not paid grading fees). Maybe if you are in business and this is how you pay the bills it matters. How many re-subs are required because of slab "issues" or poor grading standards or heaven forbid someone used CCS pressing - how much time and effort and extra grading/pressing and shipping fees are incurred - is the % difference worth it now? Me - I've been "collecting" since I was a child - still have issues my mom sent to me rolled up in a tube at summer camp when I was like 8 to 11'ish Economic theory is all my books - are 'worthless' whatever I paid (mostly cover price) is a sunk cost - the utility of the book has been used - I've read it and loved and cherished it - it is now worthless sitting in a box. ANY amount I sell it for is gain - if I sell it for less than cover price (never mind FMV) it is still a gain (I would now have actual cash in my hand , that has utility, vs nothing ,no utility, in a box) - some may say, but, but, but it is worth what FMV is - is is though??...while sitting in a box, can you take that box and pay your bills with it?... it's only 'worth' what you actually get for it... Or are these Shrodingers Comics - worth nothing and everything (alive and dead at the same time??) As long as I make back grading and shipping fees all else is 'profit' Then you get the debate on did I get 'enough' profit...so what's enough? If I hand my books over at a convention I save shipping, if I use promos I save fees - if MCS picks up from CBCS I again save shipping - these are not insignificant charges (if I sell though MCS their fees are less than some other sales channels too!) - what's the % difference now when I take those savings into account.... If I leave my MCS sales as a credit to buy another book I save a % on my purchase - if I build a credit over time I make 10% or more because my currency is losing value to the USD so my USD credit is gaining value...what's the % difference now? idk...I think % differences while real are not as big a deal as people try to make them out to be - unless this is a primary income activity where loss of a few % with a higher cost base can become death by 1000 cuts. If you are just a small fish collector does a couple % matter. Now - I've never sold an individual issue for more than $1k - for 'big' or 'rare' books is the difference there too? - I've not experienced it in the range I play in and I've been happy whatever was required to get the 'keys' I was after - Hulk 181 in 7.0 might be my most expensive purchase - although not my most 'valuable' book....are there people who would pass on their desired grade of AF15 because it was CBCS instead of CGC or would only pay less - or are those differences due to the natural fluctuations of how auctions work |
||
Post 77 IP flag post |
![]() |
DoorCntyComicColl private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by GAC I understand folks want to show the new PSA slabs but what puzzles me is why anyone would slab an X-Men #300 graded at 9.4??? People... that FMV wouldn't cover submission/shipping costs!!! And lets not get into the discussion you want to have this in your collection because in 10-20-30 years from now (assuming PSA is still around) you may end up selling it and you will be kicking yourself not coughing up the extra $10-$20 getting a raw copy that is a potential 9.8... I don't understand the logic... Quote: Originally Posted by SpiderTim Agree 100% |
||
Post 78 IP flag post |
![]() |
ComicNinja0215 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by KatKomics yo fire!! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Post 79 IP flag post |
![]() |
ComicNinja0215 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Is PSA going to have to make their own storage box just their slab can fit in it?? if that's the case;( pun intended) lame! |
||
Post 80 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
The percentage difference matters, even for someone like me who has never sold a book. Ever… and no intention of selling. Why? Because at high values it suggests that CGC books (for vintage / high value) are graded more strictly. Otherwise people would purchase a CBCS book at a discount and then re-slab as CGC… the only (rational, see below) way this does not happen is if the reslabbing results in a grade drop. Now this may not be the case… the premiums (or discounts for CBCS slabs) may be driven by books with visible problems. So only a subset of CBCS books drive this - and so you don’t get the “crack and reslab” phenomenon en masse. When searching to add a copy of AC 252 I remember happening to come across several CBCS copies - and all were in noticeably worse condition (for the grade) vs CGC counterparts. So I would not pay an equivalent price for those books - and I suspect few would… it could be those types situations are driving the difference in the aggregate data. Perhaps lower volumes make those inconsistencies more visible. Maybe there was a vintage of CBCS grading that had more problems… I vaguely recall something called out re: an employee not following protocols but perhaps I am misremembering… Counter examples abound, of course, but most of the criticism of CGC lax grading has been on moderns. An area where crack and resubmit is not viable in 99%+ of cases (no pun intended). On the flip side, maybe the market is highly irrational. I doubt this but I do not have enough direct evidence either way (on my first hand anecdotal experience). Or maybe there is no discount - I doubt this too… I have zero problem purchasing CBCS graded books. I would have no problem using its grading service as well, at the right price (and if I had greater confidence in its customer service). Quote: Originally Posted by KatKomics |
||
Post 81 IP flag post |
![]() |
ComicNinja0215 private msg quote post Address this user | |
This is why I'm grading less books in the new year. ![]() ![]() |
||
Post 82 IP flag post |
![]() |
DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
I like grading comics. It's cheaper than alcohol, cigarettes, tattoos, or hookers. Plus, I'm left with fewer regrets. | ||
Post 83 IP flag post |
![]() Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson There's always a different angle that makes total sense |
||
Post 84 IP flag post |
![]() |
esaravo private msg quote post Address this user | |
I wish someone could send me links to all these CBCS slabs that are being listed at BINs for 25% or more less than similarly graded CGC slabs. | ||
Post 85 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by esaravo Perfect!!.....I too, want these links. |
||
Post 86 IP flag post |
![]() |
Nearmint67 private msg quote post Address this user | |
@esaravo @GAC They don't exist... I bought them all... lol... Fake news sells only to suckers... Lollipop anyone... |
||
Post 87 IP flag post |
![]() |
GothamBridge private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Nuffsaid111 Personally I buy raws because I am signature hunting. I buy low grades and purples or whatever for my PC. Quote: Originally Posted by ComicNinja0215 I would imagine in the end they will conform to slab size standards as they exist now. they could stick to their guns if they understand that they are going to initially have to stand against the criticism, and its going to hurt. If they have to withstand a backlash and then they make a change to conform, it will hurt, but what do I know. |
||
Post 88 IP flag post |
![]() |
consumetheliving private msg quote post Address this user | |
I am also grading far less and have been submitting most of my golden age PC books to CBCS. By the time my daughter can sell them, it shouldn't matter what plastic tomb the books reside in, either up or zero ![]() |
||
Post 89 IP flag post |
![]() |
ComicNinja0215 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Maybe a hand full a year. Depends on the book . | ||
Post 90 IP flag post |
![]() |
KatKomics private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Davethebrave That at least is a valid defendable reason! they sell for less because the grading appears to be more generous vs - well we just don't like CBCS or the label is ugly. In the end we buy comics not cases (whatever the price point) so for a given budget $$$ amount we want to get the best copy we can. No one need defend that at a same grade one book looks better (to their eye) than another book so they are willing to pay what's in their budget. We've all seen copies of the same grade from the same company that appear more or less appealing one vs the other - never mind one company vs another. For me a high grade AC 252 is off the table - 5.0 to 6.0 though...potentially... and in those grades the cumulation of defects that get you there are legion - some I can live with others not..even if it's a 'higher grade' I would imagine for vintage books CGC has an insurmountable lead - too many years as the only player so naturally more of those issues are going to be CGC. Yes - CBCS needs improved customer service, Yes - CBCS future ,as an outsider looking in, is concerning (never good for the guy in charge to have financial based legal issues!!) Not sure what tiers the CGC issues extend to - but the various issues, past and present make me wonder what's around the corner All is academic for me at the moment - the exchange rate is out of my comfort zone - which means likely no submissions until things normalize/re-calibrate I even have to seriously consider cashing in my MCS credit depending what the rate does - if it gets even 'worse' for us then that means I'll get more $$$ if I cash in and since all my transactions are in local currency if I can gain 5 to 10% with no effort or risk...kind of a no-brainer!...lol..all depends where the credit lands at the end of the year and how badly I want certain books vs free money! |
||
Post 91 IP flag post |
![]() |
DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by esaravo I recently won an auction for an FF 186 graded 9.4 by the cgc for $25. I just paid $39 each, with discount, for CBCS to press and grade two FF 186s that came back CBCS 9.4. As a result, I paid 56% more for the CBCS graded copies than I did for the copy grade by the cgc. The alternative lesson is don't sell books that aren't in high demand as anything other than BINs regardless of who graded them. |
||
Post 92 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
The perception that CGC sells for more than CBCS (or anyone else) is because for evey CBCS sales for a book there are 15 sales for that same book. The odds that cgc will get a higher sale is 15 to 1. CGC simply has more opportunities to record a higher sale than CBCS does...that's it. EDIT |
||
Post 93 IP flag post |
![]() |
DoorCntyComicColl private msg quote post Address this user | |
Here's a perfect example of actual data available Wolverine Limited #1 1982 From CGC Census - 30282 Total slabbed / 24096 Universal graded From CBCS Population Report - 2060 Total slabbed 92% of those books slabbed by CGC... A year ago a 9.8 in early 2024 was selling in the $670-$700 range (forget Newsstand or any signature book)... CBCS in the upper $500... I see what GoCollect is showing based on sales... though it seems not all CBCS is accurate. I do have to question that based on dates sold... unless there is any other source of info for sales showing both CGC and CBCS this is what I am working with.. Look.. as collectors we just need to apply common sense. You have to include the cost factor... I understand folks purchase the slabbed for a collection that they will keep forever but keep in mind in the end you will be selling them. Hey I am sitting on a couple of thousand raw books I bought as a kid and I am slowly unloading them. My kids are not interested in them so I am going the route that will generate the most money.. Period!! I like the CBCS label but the reality is CGC is dominating and it generates the most bang for the buck. That's a fact and we need to stop ripping on them and CBCS (and PSA for that matter) because I can assure you all those companies are laughing at us all the way to the bank! Let the debate continue on!! |
||
Post 94 IP flag post |
![]() |
KatKomics private msg quote post Address this user | |
@DoorCntyComicColl welll...potentially CBCS/Beckett/Global Growth is crying all the way to the SEC or lenders and creditors...and just hoping a liquidation and sell off of assets (i.e. companies Global Growth owns like Beckett/CBCS) isn't required | ||
Post 95 IP flag post |
![]() |
DoorCntyComicColl private msg quote post Address this user | |
@KatKomics Unfortunately its the hard working folks on the lower part of that food chain who are going to pay the price... | ||
Post 96 IP flag post |
![]() |
esaravo private msg quote post Address this user | |
In my opinion, the only data that helps perpetuate the idea that CGC slabs sell for more money than CBCS slabs are auction data. I agree that CGC has probably slabbed around 90% (or more) of all graded comics. They were the first company to do it, and have been around for about 25 years. CBCS is much smaller and has been around about 10 years. Therefore, the majority of collectors, and even many non-collectors, know the CGC brand. So if there is an auction with two similar books, one in a CGC slab and one in a CBCS slab, there are a lot more people that would want the CGC slab. More competition usually means higher prices. However, there are so many variables when it comes to auctions. How many times are there two nearly “identical” books in the same auction? When that happens, why can one sometimes sell for a lot more than the other, even if they are both in CGC or CBCS slabs? In addition, prices fluctuate so much and so quickly, especially over the last few years. A 9.6 CGC book could sell for say $500 last week, and yet then sell for $450 today. So when a site like Key Comics compares a sale for a CBCS book from several months ago with a recent CGC sale, it means absolutely nothing. I am sure if you look hard enough, you can find other sales for that same book in a CGC case that sold for less than the CBCS one did months ago. I also don’t like the fact that there are so many sites and influencers that constantly only use information that makes CGC look better. But if there is a recent sale of a CBCS slab that goes for more than a recent CGC slab, there is no mention of that anywhere. I have been buying graded books for around ten years, and I have used both companies to grade books from my collection. I will continue to buy slabs from both companies. I would really love to see both of the companies survive and show respect for each other. I might as well point out here that CGC has never shown any respect to CBCS, and has gone out of their way to hurt and discredit them. How come you can post pictures of CGC slabs on the CBCS forum, but not the other way around? And for numerous years, CBCS accepted Yellow label signatures from books submitted in CGC slabs. How many times has CGC tried to exclude CBCS from events such as conventions and signings, by having exclusive rights that denied them access? Why don’t more sites report CBCS sales? Is it because there’s not enough sales, or because they are controlled by CGC? Competition is a good thing, as it should make both companies want to improve. So as collectors, we need to have more than one company that can grade comics. For the good of the hobby, can’t we all get along? |
||
Post 97 IP flag post |
![]() |
ComicNinja0215 private msg quote post Address this user | |
@esaravo 100% agree | ||
Post 98 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by esaravo Mic drop b!tches!!!! |
||
Post 99 IP flag post |
![]() |
ComicNinja0215 private msg quote post Address this user | |
@GAC damn skippy, that was ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Post 100 IP flag post |
![]() |
DoorCntyComicColl private msg quote post Address this user | |
@esaravo Totally agree. It would be nice if there was some kind of universal Database so we could do an actual analysis and get actual data and pricing from both companies... so both buyers and sellers get a realistic view on the pricing of bought and sold books.. | ||
Post 101 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
In all seriousness....@esaravo is ofcourse absolutely spot on. The "cgc sells for more" notion gets tiresome when there are obviously so many factors that go into why a book would sell for more etc. In my opinion, all things being equal, cgc does not sell for more than cbcs....cgc simply has more opportunities than cbcs. | ||
Post 102 IP flag post |
![]() |
Sigur_Ros private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by esaravo Yea, I don't think there's some big conspiracy that CGC secretly controls all these web sites. I'm pretty sure you answered your own question: Quote: Originally Posted by esaravo So yes... usually higher prices. And if you do a simple search of any vintage book on eBay, you'll see that there are a lot more CGC sales than CBCS of pretty much any given book. Not an insult, just an objective fact due to longevity. The reason a lot of smartphone accessory manufacturers focus solely on iPhones is not because Apple secretly controls them. It's because there are a lot more iPhones being used than other brands. Spend your energy where the demand is. CBCS has the better product but it doesn't matter. I sell books. The CGC books sell first. Period. |
||
Post 103 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Yeah, it's not like CGC to want to control everything and keep their competitors down....that's not like cgc at all. | ||
Post 104 IP flag post |
![]() |
ComicNinja0215 private msg quote post Address this user | |
We're so concerned about sales data and FMV, we often forget to just enjoy collecting comics. | ||
Post 105 IP flag post |