CGC knowingly damaging books?20972
 I wish I had a title.
|
ComicNinja0215 private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @flanders spine tick or two as well | ||
| Post 76 • IP flag post | ||
 I haven't aired it out. It's part of the provenance.
|
Galen130 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Studley_Dudley š¤£š¤£š¤£  |
||
| Post 77 • IP flag post | ||
 I'd like to say I still turned out alright, but that would be a lie.
|
flanders private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson Maybe it's a bad press job from CGC, followed by bad encapsulation. |
||
| Post 78 • IP flag post | ||
 If I could, I would. I swear.
|
DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @flanders Completely possible. | ||
| Post 79 • IP flag post | ||
 Not trying to be an ass since February 12, 2020.
|
HulkSmash private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by flandersQuote: Originally Posted by DrWatson I found a picture of you 2ā¦  |
||
| Post 80 • IP flag post | ||
|
I'd like to say I still turned out alright, but that would be a lie.
|
flanders private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Am I the weirdo with the goatee or the weirdo with the goatee and a beret? | ||
| Post 81 • IP flag post | ||
 Collector
|
poka private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Davethebrave https://boards.cgccomics.com/topic/350613-where-in-the-world-was-the-quality-control-at-cgc/page/310/#comments check post by Complex306 10 hours ago |
||
| Post 82 • IP flag post | ||
|
I haven't aired it out. It's part of the provenance.
|
Galen130 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Iāll just leave this hereā¦ |
||
| Post 83 • IP flag post | ||
 I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers).Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Galen130 I don't even have words for this. I don't even have words. And if I start with words, there will be many many many bad words; so I remain having no words | ||
| Post 84 • IP flag post | ||
|
I haven't aired it out. It's part of the provenance.
|
Galen130 private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Nuffsaid111 Word!!!    |
||
| Post 85 • IP flag post | ||
|
I wish I had a title.
|
ComicNinja0215 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Ooofff... |
||
| Post 86 • IP flag post | ||
 I blame the forum gremlins.
|
figment private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Galen130 (meanwhile at CGC) "Dude!!! That was my skull! I'm so wasted!!!" |
||
| Post 87 • IP flag post | ||
|
I haven't aired it out. It's part of the provenance.
|
Galen130 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by figment  |
||
| Post 88 • IP flag post | ||
|
Not trying to be an ass since February 12, 2020.
|
HulkSmash private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by flandersIām pretty sure you are Adam Savage and Dr Watson is Jamie Hyneman. |
||
| Post 89 • IP flag post | ||
|
I wish I had a title.
|
ComicNinja0215 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Galen130 The upside down variant |
||
| Post 90 • IP flag post | ||
 Suck it up, buttercup!!
|
KatKomics private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by ComicNinja0215 dang!!!! and here I was looking for CPV issues.... |
||
| Post 91 • IP flag post | ||
 Collector
|
robertofredrico private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Galen130 Reminds me of this classicā¦  |
||
| Post 92 • IP flag post | ||
|
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers). Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
| These things kinda prove that QC is not part of either company's infrastructure. One person can make the mistake when making the product. But a second person who is responsible for QC letting it go? Nope - doesn't make sense to me. Or perhaps QC is a sampling of the total as is done in some manufacturing. I just can't see how two people (or more) can miss these; and allow to go out to their customer base. We're all being railroaded if we are lead to believe there is a QC department and they're doing 100% inspection. |
||
| Post 93 • IP flag post | ||
 " . "
|
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
| The issue is that people doing a routine process are ripe for these mistakes. As incredible as it seems with the examples, it could be as simple as someone ordering (positioning) the slab in the wrong direction for a standard assembly and then similarly, the mis-oriented book flows through another assembly-type QC process. I think the ātwo person reviewā is in the grading stage and likely eats up most of the labor time that can be directed to comic grading. Consider all the steps involved in grading a comic and then consider the prices charged. For modern books letās assume $25. Now, consider the handling steps of the books: * inbound logistics (receiving, opening, sorting, transporting and placing books) * invoice matching and data entry (partially automated) * grading steps and handling * encapsulation steps * QC steps * outbound logistics and data entry * other overhead that is fixed and needs to be allocated (building, utilities, CS, marketing etc) * add on the materials cost for the slabbing itself Now, consider where the average hourly pay stands in the US. So how much total time can be allocated and still achieve some semblance of margin? This is a business that relies mostly on US labor, so not like your shoes or cheap electronics. If you factor all the above in, you will see that the manual labor time that can be spent per book at the lower price points is exceptionally small. So I am not shocked by these seemingly stupid errors. If someone places the slab in the wrong direction, and the reviewer is doing his routine work ā¦ it could slip through. Of course there are ways to catch this or reduce the likelihood, but noone would pay to absolutely eliminate the mistakesā¦ except when the books are worth big $$$ā¦ and where the fees are commensurately higher. |
||
| Post 94 • IP flag post | ||
 I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this.
|
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
| These upside down book errors are extremely rare.....once the inner well was divided, seperating the label from the comic, it made mistakes like this more likely but it's still rare....to the point that it doesn't even matter. | ||
| Post 95 • IP flag post | ||
|
" . "
|
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by GAC And eliminating the chance of it ever happening is not cost-effective. Especially vs the cost to correctā¦ The real investment of time has to be in authenticating books vs forgeries. Especially high-value books. The moment a pure forgery slips by of something like an AF15 or AC1, etcā¦ that is when the confidence in grading takes a massive hit. |
||
| Post 96 • IP flag post | ||
|
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers). Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
| I don't even think it's a miss. I think they may have random sampling during QC for low value books. This is just too obvious even for the boring, routine, low pay employee to miss. And it bothers the F out of me because it is yet another example of their incompetence that is just tossed aside as "well it's a low cost organization that needs to keep prices down, so all these mistakes we see are bound to happen". It's too much; too often; and in too many areas in Total to just brush aside incompetence and unacceptable outcomes. Maybe this alone is acceptable and brushed aside; but not ALL the topics we see is NOT acceptable. Their Quality, in total, for all issues, sucks and that is the mic drop. My "Mechanical Error" rate of return is around 15 - 20% for the last few years. Is that ok because they have to keep costs down? No it is not |
||
| Post 97 • IP flag post | ||
 I got screwed six ways to Sunday.
|
sborock_ComicLink private msg quote post Address this user | |
| QC was VERY important to me, Haspel and Litch when opening CGC. Same when I opened CBCS. Beckett got rid of QC when they acquired CBCS. Dumb move! That said, they have now a QC person or persons. A bit too late. CGC has NO excuse. Period. We must protect our hobby!!!!! |
||
| Post 98 • IP flag post | ||
|
Not trying to be an ass since February 12, 2020.
|
HulkSmash private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by GACis it? I was thinking art was subjective to perception. Perhaps the true meaning of this captured moment of Spawn comes through at this upside down perspective  Todd is playing games? The rest are actually slabbed wrong? š¤Æ |
||
| Post 99 • IP flag post | ||
|
I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this.
|
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by HulkSmash CBCS QC are expressing themselves artistically! |
||
| Post 100 • IP flag post | ||
 being an ass and being a clown are two very different things.
|
HAmistoso private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Post 101 • IP flag post | ||
 I live in RI and Rhode Islanders eat chili with beans.
|
esaravo private msg quote post Address this user | |
| One of the previous CGC bad slab designs was known as the Frankenslab or creep engine slab. How about calling this one the Banana Boat Slab? | ||
| Post 102 • IP flag post | ||
|
I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this.
|
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
| or the Boomerang Slab.....the problem that keeps coming back. | ||
| Post 103 • IP flag post | ||
|
I wish I had a title.
|
ComicNinja0215 private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Why is this so hard?? What witchcraft did CBCS conjure that nobody else seems to be able to accomplish?? | ||
| Post 104 • IP flag post | ||
 Please continue to ignore anything I post.
|
southerncross private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by esaravo  |
||
| Post 105 • IP flag post | ||