New label ?19650
![]() |
DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Nearmint67 Your first statement is contradictory to your second statement. |
||
Post 151 IP flag post |
![]() |
Nearmint67 private msg quote post Address this user | |
@DrWatson only on the Pedigree books. | ||
Post 152 IP flag post |
![]() |
HeinzDad private msg quote post Address this user | |
I have one pedigree book that could be greatly improved upon. I wonโt open it because Iโd have to stroke someone else to do so. | ||
Post 153 IP flag post |
![]() |
SidTheSquid private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Nuffsaid111 Your eyesight is better than mine! But I must say, getting rid of those would be of more importance to me than a redesign. |
||
Post 154 IP flag post |
![]() |
James42 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Anybody got pictures of the back of the label? | ||
Post 155 IP flag post |
![]() Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by SidTheSquid Agreed. The label design is purely subjective. On the other hand if you polled 1000 people about those dumb serrations, I have to believe 98% would say "get rid of them". That does matter because it's unprofessional looking. |
||
Post 156 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Nuffsaid111 I can't see the serrations either. For sure, given the choice to have serrations or not, everyone will choose Not. But if not having serrations means an increase in slabbing cost, I'd choose to keep the serrations. To me, the serrations are fine enough to not be a big deal. |
||
Post 157 IP flag post |
![]() |
Belarak private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Jesse_O @flanders Thanks for the photos. The different labels for the higher grades doesn't surprise me. That is what Beckett does with their card grading. I think this will give all the critiques about the label something to think about. Now the label IS the focus. |
||
Post 158 IP flag post |
![]() |
HAmistoso private msg quote post Address this user | |
![]() |
||
Post 159 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
EDIT: Images courtesy of:![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Post 160 IP flag post |
![]() |
Sagii private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Jesse_O So I have a pile I want to send off to in split submissions. If send off on Monday will i get new label or should I wait till official announcement/launch? Forgive me if this has been clarified already. |
||
Post 161 IP flag post |
![]() Rest in Peace |
Jesse_O private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Sagii I'd hold off shipping anything until they give a start date. Or, more likely, you hear through the grapevine that they are starting it. CBCS doesn't have a great track record of announcing, or keeping, start dates for anything. If I hear anything from reliable sources, I'll be sure to pass it on. | ||
Post 162 IP flag post |
![]() Rest in Peace |
Jesse_O private msg quote post Address this user | |
At least once in the past, they exhausted their in house supply of labels before switching. IMO, that's another reason to hold off right now. | ||
Post 163 IP flag post |
![]() |
Sagii private msg quote post Address this user | |
Post 164 IP flag post |
![]() |
Nearmint67 private msg quote post Address this user | |
@GAC Dude... Your on youtube... ![]() ![]() |
||
Post 165 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Nearmint67 Lol! That's funny! ![]() ![]() EDIT: Found it: Images above courtesy of: ![]() |
||
Post 166 IP flag post |
![]() |
MutantMania private msg quote post Address this user | |
Well if nothing else it's getting people to talk about CBCS ![]() |
||
Post 167 IP flag post |
![]() |
James42 private msg quote post Address this user | |
So now that we have seen them, will we get an actual announcement and timeline for rollout? | ||
Post 168 IP flag post |
![]() |
DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
I heard Monday. | ||
Post 169 IP flag post |
![]() |
flanders private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson Hopefully they don't announce a price increase shortly after. |
||
Post 170 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by flanders I'm hoping a discount code accompanies the announcement....20% off grading fee: NEWLABEL code....I'd submit for sure. |
||
Post 171 IP flag post |
![]() |
KatKomics private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by GAC maybe....I'm torn....the last few orders I've gotten back the CGC I didn't get hassled by FedEx...that alone might have me using them again..$50 to $70 ish bucks in shakedown after by FedEx offsets most of any discount...but there are always the verified books that only CBCS can do.....for now..... |
||
Post 172 IP flag post |
![]() |
Sagii private msg quote post Address this user | |
Post 173 IP flag post |
![]() |
figment private msg quote post Address this user | |
Just got the email. It's official... I like the old "plain" ones better. However, I think we still have one of the old rivet labels so I may take advantage of the $10 reholder. |
||
Post 175 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Very smart move on the $10 reholder offer. Well done CBCS. | ||
Post 176 IP flag post |
![]() |
HooperSchaefer private msg quote post Address this user | |
The info webpage is laid out nice. I especially like the slider for old vs new, lol. Iโll most likely take advantage of the reholder offer, but unsure how many books. Definitely at least the one CBCS 9.9 I have. Honestly, I was really satisfied with the last refresh. But I understand that people who want the grade to be a focal point probably outnumber those like me (or at least are louder online). |
||
Post 177 IP flag post |
![]() Rest in Peace |
Jesse_O private msg quote post Address this user | |
You would think they would have high definition samples of their new 9.8, 9.9 and 10 labels, but here they are regardless. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Post 178 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
can someone confirm if there are serrations or not? | ||
Post 179 IP flag post |
![]() |
SidTheSquid private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by GAC Yes, there are- the video on FB shows a close up where they can be seen. |
||
Post 180 IP flag post |
This topic is archived. Start new topic?