Captain Britain # 119635
Collector | Gaz973 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Now that CBCS has started magazine grading, does anyone know if their policy regarding free gifts is the same as CGC’s? In other words they are regarded as incomplete if the free gift is missing. I’m assuming that would be the case as that’s how it works for ASM # 238 with the Tatooz but just wanted to be sure before I send as I don’t want them to discard the mask that’s with my Cap Britain # 1. I feel sure that I’m right but just wanted to confirm so I don’t get paranoid. | ||
Post 1 IP flag post |
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers). Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Gaz973 This is a really really good question. I have a similar one with my 2000 A.D. #2 (1st Dredd) that is missing the Biotronix stickers |
||
Post 2 IP flag post |
Suck it up, buttercup!! | KatKomics private msg quote post Address this user | |
I would assume a similar policy to CGC - needs mask/boomerang/airplane/tattoo to be complete I'm also pretty sure that if it's loose then it won't be encapsulated with the comic/magazine i.e. still needs to be affixed however it was originally Is your mask etc. still attached? |
||
Post 3 IP flag post |
Collector | Gaz973 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by KatKomics The mask isn’t attached though I was under the impression that they aren’t normally attached anyway. Not sure if anyone can confirm this either way. |
||
Post 4 IP flag post |
I like bean sprouts. | James42 private msg quote post Address this user | |
AFAIK, neither the mask or boomerang were attached. Just dropped in. This was pretty standard with UK publications for a long time. I remember buying car magazines on vacation in the late 80s and having stuff just fall out of them when I picked them up. By the mid-90s, bigger publishers started using polybags, but giveaways still were loose. | ||
Post 5 IP flag post |
Collector | Gaz973 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by James42 Thanks for confirming, that’s what I thought. |
||
Post 6 IP flag post |
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers). Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
I'll never fully understand the way these grading companies handle "stuff" that is not the comic itself. In my feeble head, if the item is attached in any way (i.e. stapled), it's part of the comic If the item is not attached to the comic, then it's not part of the comic and shouldn't be graded as if it is missing (if it is missing). And yet somehow, comics that are graded that had items floating around in a polybag or just laying in the middle of the comic that fall out are considered "incomplete". Somehow I'm supposed to accept that a polybag doesn't count. A trading card doesn't count? Technically, it's part of the delivered "product" to store shelves. I guess because graders can't see within the bag. All these rules created to support and help only the grading companies does not give me a warm fuzzy feeling. Not a fan of their criteria; never will be. |
||
Post 7 IP flag post |
If the viagra is working you should be well over a 9.8. | xkonk private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Nuffsaid111 Are they? If I send an X-Force 1 out of the bag without the card, it gets a 0.5? |
||
Post 8 IP flag post |
If I could, I would. I swear. | DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by xkonk No, if, in this example, the card is loose inside a polybag, then it isn't included in grading and will be returned if the book is submitted still in the polybag. |
||
Post 9 IP flag post |
If the viagra is working you should be well over a 9.8. | xkonk private msg quote post Address this user | |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method | ||
Post 10 IP flag post |
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers). Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by xkonk This is actually my point even though I got it turned around and backwards way of getting there. (I was thinking about the 20000 A.D. #2 with the Biotronic stickers; not a polybagged card). And therein lies the problem. A card is ok (grading as expected) But inserted Biotronic stickers are not? (considered incomplete) An unattached free gift is not? (considered incomplete??) Polybag missing (grading as expected) That protective white cover we see on comics stapled to the comic (is that ok when we actually remove that protective cover? Where is the line and who decides this? Exactly - the grading companies; not us. And that is what aggravates me. They control the hobby; not the hobbyists. It's all bullsh&t they make the rules I could even accept the B.S. if there was at least some consistent B.S. |
||
Post 11 IP flag post |
If I could, I would. I swear. | DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
If it's physically attached to the book, it counts. If not, it doesn't. It's like attached and personal property property in real estate. If it's wall to wall installed carpeting, it's attached to the home and goes with the sale of the home. If it's an 8 x 10 area rug that you can roll up and take with you, it's personal property, not attached, and not expected in the sale. |
||
Post 12 IP flag post |
I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this. | GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson This is how I always thought the rule went too...if it was attached to the comic, it still must be or it will receive an incomplete grade/designation. If it was never attached, then it doesn't need to be present and the book will be graded with a proper grade. Polybags are inconsequential as they must be removed anyway when grading/encapsulating. |
||
Post 13 IP flag post |
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers). Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
And the white protective covers that are stapled on the front of the comic that (most of us) tear off? | ||
Post 14 IP flag post |
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers). Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
And this....... Stickers NOT attached to the prog, but still given a green label when graded. And thus my anger of the inconsistency of an "apparent" rule that I call bullshit on. Protective white covers stapled? - meh... you can tear them off without a hit A prog that has stickers inserted (but not attached) - meh - green label because they say so. Not consistent; not good. What else is new |
||
Post 15 IP flag post |
I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this. | GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Inconsequential....similar to the polybag...it's more akin to packaging/protection than anything art related. | ||
Post 16 IP flag post |
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers). Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
I get it. And as with anything I understand alternative points of view. But in my opinion, their criteria is inconsistent and subjective unto itself. And I don't appreciate when grading/label color rules have this level/degree of subjectivity. There's enough subjectivity issues in Sarasota with grading. Having subjectivity with rules is more than I can bear. |
||
Post 17 IP flag post |
I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this. | GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Nuffsaid111 Are we certain the stickers originally came with the book loose? If so, that is odd then that the book would get a green label. |
||
Post 18 IP flag post |
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers). Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
I'm not 100% certain; but from the much research I've done just on the Stickers, these were simply inserted in the Prog (the Prog is essentially just a small newspaper) without being secured to the product | ||
Post 19 IP flag post |
Collector | Gaz973 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson Hi Jim, hope life is good with you. It is kinda inconsistent, such as with the Cap Britain in question, the mask isn’t attached but is considered incomplete without it. The same with the Tatooz I believe, I seem to remember that people robbed them from the Fantastic Four issue that contained them to send in with the ASM # 238s for grading. Not that I’m criticising CBCS for the policy, I guess they’ve gone with the same policy as CGC to keep consistency with already established guidelines as it would be a mess if they didn’t. |
||
Post 20 IP flag post |
I'm waiting.... (tapping fingers). Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Gaz973 "Inconsistent" - the consistent source of my frustration and ire towards the grading companies. And making up b.s. rules that aren't consistently even followed. We're just the shitty consumer; so just live with it |
||
Post 21 IP flag post |
If I could, I would. I swear. | DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Gaz973 Hey, Garry. Doing well. I miss you guys... even Nick, lol. |
||
Post 22 IP flag post |
If I could, I would. I swear. | DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
It has always been my understanding that loose objects weren't encapsulated with the book. It was said they could move around inside the case and potentially damage the book. | ||
Post 23 IP flag post |
I like bean sprouts. | James42 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson And this is where the stupid comes in. If the mask (in this case) is removed to avoid damage after slabbing, then the book should be graded the same whether the mask is sent to the grader or not. Can't be incomplete if it's not really part of the book. |
||
Post 24 IP flag post |
Collector | Gaz973 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson You miss Nick? I’ll mention it to him, I’m sure he’ll mutter and grumble something in reply. |
||
Post 25 IP flag post |
Collector | Gaz973 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson Do you know who is in charge of CBCS magazine grading that we can tag in this thread to confirm their policy re the Cap Britain mask? |
||
Post 26 IP flag post |
CBCS Pressing | SteveRicketts private msg quote post Address this user | |
If a book is missing an insert that was supposed to be attached to it, the grade would top out at 7.0. If an item can not be safely encapsulated with the book, it is returned to the customer and it is considered "missing." If it can be safely encapsulated with the book, it would just be considered "detached" and the hit to the grade would be less significant than one missing the insert. |
||
Post 27 IP flag post |
Collector | Gaz973 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by SteveRicketts@SteveRicketts thanks for the reply. Can you confirm the situation specifically regarding Captain Britain # 1 please? The free gift was never attached to the book when produced so would it get encased with the book when it is slabbed? CGC slab the books complete with the unattached mask and label the book incomplete if the mask is missing, does CBCS use the same policy? |
||
Post 28 IP flag post |
If I could, I would. I swear. | DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
I would send it in, Garry. I sincerely doubt that CBCS would deviate from how the cgc grades it. It seems that it will get a grade hit if it isn't present. | ||
Post 29 IP flag post |
Collector | Gaz973 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson That’s what I was thinking Jim, I find it hard to believe that CBCS would handle these books different to CGC. |
||
Post 30 IP flag post |
This topic is archived. Start new topic?