Have you all seen this data on CGC submission quantities?19613
![]() |
EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user | |
Pretty interesting info organizing and sorting data from the CGC census: http://cgcdata.com/cgc/cgctop/ |
||
Post 1 IP flag post |
![]() |
multi007 private msg quote post Address this user | |
@EbayMafia cool. It also shows me to never EVER expect to get a 10.0 on ANY raw I submit. | ||
Post 2 IP flag post |
![]() |
Rafel private msg quote post Address this user | |
Those are some amazing data. | ||
Post 3 IP flag post |
![]() |
HulkSmash private msg quote post Address this user | |
Wow. ASM 300 at #1 with 34k. No wonder so many sit on LCS walls with numbers like that. | ||
Post 4 IP flag post |
![]() |
EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by HulkSmash ASM 300 is most submitted, Spawn #1 is most 9.8's. |
||
Post 5 IP flag post |
![]() |
EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user | |
I was kind of surprised that it takes 520 slabbed copies to be in the top 2,500. | ||
Post 6 IP flag post |
![]() |
makahuka private msg quote post Address this user | |
Pretty cool, CCG did just celebrate More than 75 million collectibles graded. 55 million coins graded, 10 million comics graded and 3 million cards graded. Now, CCG has graded more than 75 million collectibles across all of the categories it serves, including coins, paper money, comic books, trading cards, sports cards, video games, stamps and memorabilia. | ||
Post 7 IP flag post |
![]() |
DWeeB1967 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by HulkSmashIt still AMAZES me that this book sells for the prices that it does. I understand the significance but still. The market does what the market does, I guess. |
||
Post 8 IP flag post |
![]() |
Instant_Subtitles private msg quote post Address this user | |
Other than the numbers being off due to slabs being opened for numerous reasons, that is impressive. However, I find it ironic that CGC still lists X-Men Annual 10 as the 1st appearance of the X-Babies, when the official 1st and origin issue is X-Men Annual 12. ![]() I say that because the whole de-aging portion in the story was done so Mojo could "reboot" them into his version of the team. With the New Mutants, acting as X-Men, saving them. As well as the fact that name "X-Babies" was a name one of the members of the New Mutants called themselves, while complaining that they will not be real X-Men anytime soon. |
||
Post 9 IP flag post |
![]() |
cyrano0521 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by multi007 No one should EVER expect to get 10.0, except on square bound, hard paper books and maybe full shipping box finds. |
||
Post 10 IP flag post |
![]() |
cyrano0521 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DWeeB1967 Don’t forget New Mutants 98 on the list of “WHAT DID THAT SELL FOR?” |
||
Post 11 IP flag post |
![]() |
HulkSmash private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by cyrano0521CGC is where I’d expect 10.0s from. I have a standard comic CBCS 9.9 that floored me. the book is immaculate; I expected 9.8 assuming it arrived safely. Another copy of the same book came back 9.8 of the expected 9.6/9.8. The only difference i could see on the 9.9 is super sharp corners as if it came right off the press and floated to my hands untouched by further machinery, packaging, or transportation. |
||
Post 12 IP flag post |
![]() |
EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user | |
After Spawn 1 (number 2 on the list), the next slab that I own is X-men 101 (number 58) and New Teen Titans 2 (number 62). I own several books in between 2 and 58, but none of them slabbed. | ||
Post 13 IP flag post |
![]() |
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DWeeB1967 Amazing Spider-Man #300 has one of the lowest 9.8-to-total submissions ratios that you will find on a modern book, with only 5% graded at a 9.8. |
||
Post 14 IP flag post |
![]() |
flanders private msg quote post Address this user | |
@EbayMafia it looks I have a knack for slabbing extremely common books, including multiple copies of X-Men #4 (Omega Red) and X-Men Annual #14. I'm envious that you have less of a need to slab or buy modern slabbed books. 2. Spawn #1 3. ASM #361 6. Wolverine LS #1 7. X-Men #266 11. X-Men #1 15. Spider-Man #1 Silver 18. X-Men #4 30. ASM #362 32. ASM #298 51. Wolverine LS #2 64. Wolverine LS #3 72. Wolverine LS #4 81. X-Men Annual #14 85. X-Men #244 |
||
Post 15 IP flag post |
![]() |
MurrayC private msg quote post Address this user | |
I wonder how many of those are resubmits after they've been cracked open for a clean and press and/or signature event? | ||
Post 16 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck Which makes perfect sense because it is also one of the most valuable modern books. So more copies (as a %) are worth submitting than most moderns. Majority of the many, many graded copies are still 9.0+ graded. In other words, not scarce at all in great condition. Many excellent (ungraded) copies remain out there too. |
||
Post 17 IP flag post |
![]() |
Silversorrow private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by MurrayC I know I have a Star Trek #1 that shows up 3 times on the CBCS census as after the initial time I sent it in for grading I have sent it in 2 more times for signatures and all 3 serial numbers still show up on the census after having contacted CBCS multiple times about the issue. Quote: Originally Posted by HulkSmash I have been extremely lucky myself after having submitted about 100 books total to CBCS (none to CGC) so far and having 3 of them come back as 9.9's! Though admittedly one was a cardstock cover and one was a chromium cover but the 3rd one was a standard comic. Would love to know why they weren't 10's though as I cannot even see the remotest inkling of a flaw on any of them. |
||
Post 18 IP flag post |
![]() |
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Davethebrave Not true, according to the list, the average grade of an ASM #300 is 8.61. This is lower than pretty much every other modern book on that list. |
||
Post 19 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
. | ||
Post 20 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck Someone doesn’t know average from median. Re: second sentence, I explained why above. Re-read. |
||
Post 21 IP flag post |
![]() |
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Davethebrave Easy there Dave. Let’s keep it respectful. The list only mentions average, so that’s what I referred to. Name some other modern books that have less high-grade-to-total submitted than ASM #300. |
||
Post 22 IP flag post |
![]() |
James42 private msg quote post Address this user | |
I was surprised at how many of these I actually had. I was amused that all the books I have on the list that are graded are in CBCS cases. | ||
Post 23 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck You corrected me - without basis. So I corrected your erroneous correction. Re: grade distribution, I already explained why. Find me a modern book with similar overall scarcity where copies graded <8.0 were selling for >$700. Hint, there isn’t one other than ASM 300. TMNT, Bone 1, Albedo 2 were tiny fractions of the print run. They are the only books in that category. So of course more low grade copies were submitted for ASM 300 - it makes economic sense to. The majority are still 9.0+, which is remarkable. I am guessing there are many, many still to come. |
||
Post 24 IP flag post |
![]() |
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Davethebrave We are looking at a specific dataset here, which does not include the “majority” numbers you are claiming. Here’s a hint for you. If you’re going to rely on another more complete dataset, then simply cite it with a link along with your argument. Otherwise, use the data provided. Another hint. I pointed out ASM #300’s ratio to you first. And yet another hint. TMNT #1 and Albedo #2 did not originate in the modern era (1985 and up). |
||
Post 25 IP flag post |
![]() |
flanders private msg quote post Address this user | |
http://www.cgcdata.com/cgc/search/isolateid/273 Universal Grade Mean: 8.59 Median: 9.2 Mode: 9.4 |
||
Post 26 IP flag post |
![]() |
Bronte private msg quote post Address this user | |
My question is who restores a .5 book? | ||
Post 27 IP flag post |
![]() |
EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Davethebrave This explains most of it. I think there is a timing component to it also. When you factor in the variables of when pressing became a common practice and when the books achieved "slab worthy" value, that may play a role in the distribution of grades. ASM 300 is 11 years older than NM 98 and 4 years younger than Secret Wars 8. But it achieved wide-grade "slab worthy" value before both of these books...in an era when pressing was not widely available. So many of the slabs with grades below 9.0 may not even exist today. In fact, many of the 9.0's-9.4's on the census may well have been cracked and pressed since they were first graded. Certainly many were not cracked, but that 34,000 number is probably overstated by several thousand, all of them likely being less than 9.6. NM 98 and SW 8 would be more likely to have already been pressed before the first submission. |
||
Post 28 IP flag post |
![]() |
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by EbayMafia Or, it’s that blasted black back cover ![]() |
||
Post 29 IP flag post |
![]() |
EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck Good point. I might have to edit my previous comment to "." |
||
Post 30 IP flag post |
This topic is archived. Start new topic?