Tales of Suspense 39 vs. Tales of Suspense 3919299
![]() Splotches is gettin old! |
Nuffsaid111 private msg quote post Address this user | |
When the answer to any question is likely at least half the population aren't all that bright/savvy or have dumbass tunnel vision, then everything begins to make complete sense. | ||
Post 51 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
I don't know for certain but there does appear to be an uninformed bias against CBCS. That's a positive when buying CBCS slabs but a negative when selling. | ||
Post 52 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Studley_Dudley In the (highly) unlikely event I win something, I promise to post here. In fact, if I do, I may take the extremely unusual step of even selling some of my books… |
||
Post 53 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by GAC Would you rather have the book with (what appears to be) a rusty staple (or two) or Newton’s rings in this case? To me the CGC book is the better copy here. It has better centering too. White pages vs rusty staples at that high a grade… |
||
Post 54 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Davethebrave Good point...rusty staples are a turn off for many collectors. It'll be interesting where they both end. One hears that "CGC sells for more than CBCS" so often that one starts to think maybe it's true. I'd like to see these bigger books in CBCS cases sell for higher when there's a directly competing listing. |
||
Post 55 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
In the home stretch. The CGC book has a sizable lead. I think it is clearly the nicer copy but I certainly wouldn’t pay the amount of premium implied at the moment. With just over 3 hrs: CGC 7.0 at $19k CBCS 7.0 at $12k My guess is the gap will shrink but not fully close. |
||
Post 56 IP flag post |
![]() |
Nearmint67 private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Davethebrave That's an insane gap, basically over who the grading company was. | ||
Post 57 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Nearmint67 Agree but I expect it to largely close. I also think some gap in favor of the CGC book is warranted. It is better centered, most defects on back cover, and clean (not rusty) and better aligned staples. |
||
Post 58 IP flag post |
![]() |
figment private msg quote post Address this user | |
And down the stretch they come!![]() Get your popcorn ready for the live bidding session at the end of the proxy period. |
||
Post 59 IP flag post |
![]() |
multi007 private msg quote post Address this user | |
I’ve read and watched several videos where the opinions of the authors are CGC grades more strict than cbcs, and if you send in a cbcs 9.8 to CGC, it will come back a 9.6. If that is the general consensus in comic book land, that might explain the price disparities here. I’m not experienced enough to agree or disagree though. |
||
Post 60 IP flag post |
![]() |
codychunn private msg quote post Address this user | |
There are as many grades as there are graders and defects. Text or numbers they are both subjective to the grader's state of mind. Liberal one day, conservative the next. It is an ANALOG system with infinite points on a number line. Then you have to monetize that assessment which is another analog number with feathered edges (price haggling). Regardless of perceived condition we place the value on the item of what we will spend. The sellers didn't price the books, the buyers did. I think any disparity between grading companies realized final sales is a CONFIDENCE issue and should either normalize or see one company restructure or fold. -opinion- |
||
Post 61 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Well, the book I was after (AC7) slipped through my fingers as I did a few minutes of yard work. On the bright side, saved myself $300 (the quote from a neighborhood kid to rake up some sticks from hedge and bush pruning I did the other day). Took me about 30 mins. During that time got the alert the issue was going to live auction soon and I missed it. It sold just under my limit so I consider this a “miss” due to my negligence. Buyer did very well. TOS39 7 vs 7 is fun to watch but my only real interest was seeing if I could snag one of my favorite GA covers at a very reasonable price… |
||
Post 62 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Maybe the lawn care kid bought the book. $600/hr isn’t too shabby. | ||
Post 63 IP flag post |
![]() |
Nearmint67 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Davethebrave Is he hiring lol... |
||
Post 64 IP flag post |
![]() |
EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Davethebrave He's probably the General Contractor. Was going to sub it out for $100 and keep $200 for his efforts. |
||
Post 65 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
$24k CGC 7.0 $20k CBCS 7.0 |
||
Post 66 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Davethebrave do you think the CGC copy was $4K better than the CBCS copy? | ||
Post 67 IP flag post |
![]() |
Broker1 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by GAC More importantly, it seems the buyer did. |
||
Post 68 IP flag post |
![]() |
MutantMania private msg quote post Address this user | |
I'll take the raw copy I got for a buck 20 years ago ![]() |
||
Post 69 IP flag post |
![]() |
figment private msg quote post Address this user | |
Photo finish not required. Was it a case of market perception? A rusty staple despite white pages? A crazed audience? Only the buyers know for sure. ![]() |
||
Post 70 IP flag post |
![]() |
Optic_Blast private msg quote post Address this user | |
Looks like CGC won this one. | ||
Post 71 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by GAC No. I do think it was $2k better. Or some amount of premium was warranted because it was the nicer book overall. Even if both were fairly graded. Since I wasn’t the high bidder (on either) my opinion doesn’t really matter though, does it? The Action Comics 7 1.8 “green label” I was actually trying to win should, in my opinion, be worth 2x either of these books. Yet I didn’t end up winning that one either. Despite the value I see in it. So my opinion really doesn’t matter. |
||
Post 72 IP flag post |
![]() |
GAC private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Davethebrave Collector opinions matter. That's a big difference in price. |
||
Post 73 IP flag post |
![]() |
jeffreyk1965 private msg quote post Address this user | |
About the difference I expected in a vintage book. Around 20 to 25%. Both are nice books. | ||
Post 74 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by jeffreyk1965 You’d expect a 20-25% premium as a matter of course? Seems an odd general expectation unless you think CGC is a much stricter grader. |
||
Post 75 IP flag post |
![]() |
Broker1 private msg quote post Address this user | |
I think the difference is just based on what the market bears for the different grading services. Expecting that based on past data is logical. | ||
Post 76 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Broker1 No, it isn’t. Unless there is a perceived difference in grading. In this case the CGC 7 book looked better. |
||
Post 77 IP flag post |
![]() |
Broker1 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Davethebrave Whatever you need to tell yourself. |
||
Post 78 IP flag post |
![]() |
Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Broker1 LOL |
||
Post 79 IP flag post |
This topic is archived. Start new topic?