New label1773
![]() |
NewComics private msg quote post Address this user | |
Peter Jackson's first movie!![]() |
||
Post 26 IP flag post |
![]() |
Studley_Dudley private msg quote post Address this user | |
Anyone get a slab with that new label yet? Still pretty early in its circulation. | ||
Post 27 IP flag post |
![]() |
esaravo private msg quote post Address this user | |
Got these from FedEx today. The new labels look so much better than the rivets! Had these signed at RI Comic Con in December. They were my first trial for pressing. I thought the ASM 121 was a 6.0 before pressing and hoped that it would improve by a half point to maybe one point. Guess what? It's still a 6.0. ![]() |
||
Post 28 IP flag post |
![]() |
esaravo private msg quote post Address this user | |
The second comic is a Thor 126, the first issue with that title. I thought it was a 7.0 or even 7.5 before pressing, and hoped for an 8.0 after pressing. Guess what? It's a 6.5. So much for the notion that SA books get preferential grading compared to newer books. It is one of the nicest 6.5 SA book that I have seen (IMO).![]() |
||
Post 29 IP flag post |
![]() |
DertyComix private msg quote post Address this user | |
So much of a cleaner look. I am pleased with it. | ||
Post 30 IP flag post |
![]() |
Despain private msg quote post Address this user | |
@esaravo So there's no sign of waves inside the Mylar or case, right? | ||
Post 31 IP flag post |
![]() |
DarthLego private msg quote post Address this user | |
I like how they color matched the holofoil to the label color. | ||
Post 32 IP flag post |
![]() |
shrewbeer private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by esaravo Care to post the notes on that? I cant possibly see how thats under 7 with a cover like that, there must be something up |
||
Post 33 IP flag post |
![]() |
VisceralDreams private msg quote post Address this user | |
I agree with shrewbeer That book looks clean |
||
Post 34 IP flag post |
![]() |
esaravo private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Despain - none. That's something I looked at based on another thread. | ||
Post 35 IP flag post |
![]() |
Despain private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by esaravo Thank you. That alleviates some of my worries. |
||
Post 36 IP flag post |
![]() |
esaravo private msg quote post Address this user | |
@shrewbeer and @VisceralDreams - small water stain on bottom rear of cover near spine. In my experiences, CBCS really lowers grades for any type of staining. I'm wondering why I didn't get a "checkmark" since the book presents better than the 6.5. | ||
Post 37 IP flag post |
![]() |
DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
Because the water stain is more than likely visible. The check mark is more for defects that aren't discernible through the case or inside the book. | ||
Post 38 IP flag post |
![]() |
esaravo private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson If that's true, how come Comic Connect is selling an ASM 50 graded 5.5 by CBCS with a checkmark (original label) that has water staining and rippling clearly visible on it's back cover? |
||
Post 39 IP flag post |
![]() |
dielinfinite private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by esavaro sigh, one book in my latest order apparently has a 1.5" stain on the inside back cover that somehow neither Joey nor I were aware of. It's the only defect on the notes and the book got an 8.5* |
||
Post 40 IP flag post |
![]() |
DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by esaravo No idea. |
||
Post 41 IP flag post |
![]() Rest in Peace |
Jesse_O private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by esaravo If you look at the notes, there is a "1.25" tear top edge of 8th page near spine". My guess is that without that defect, it would have graded higher. https://www.cbcscomics.com/grading-notes/7009511-AA-026 |
||
Post 42 IP flag post |
![]() |
shrewbeer private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by dielinfinite That makes sense. Add the small other defects and it gets a 6.5. Seems a stain drops a book 1-2 full grades @Jesse_O thats the wrong book, but somehow you got in the ballpark (i cant read it from the pic nohow). |
||
Post 43 IP flag post |
![]() Rest in Peace |
Jesse_O private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by shrewbeer Not sure how it could be the wrong book. Comic Connect only lists one ASM 50 CBCS 5.5 with a star. I was able to zoom in and get the number. Then it was just a matter of looking at the notes. |
||
Post 44 IP flag post |
![]() |
conditionfreak private msg quote post Address this user | |
Interesting that I don't have a preference of any label look. They are all just fine. I don't collect labels. I collect books. |
||
Post 45 IP flag post |
![]() |
DarthLego private msg quote post Address this user | |
Some people like pickles, those people are weird. ![]() |
||
Post 46 IP flag post |
![]() |
shrewbeer private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Jesse_O Woops. Thought you were rferring to the Thor notes, read it too quick |
||
Post 47 IP flag post |
![]() |
ZosoRocks private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by conditionfreak Came here...BUT,...I have heard the CGC red lanel, I think their first label or early on at least, is very few, thus I would think those books, are sought after. Sort of a dual level to collecting comics. Just my thinking.... |
||
Post 48 IP flag post |
![]() |
shrewbeer private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by ZosoRocks If its "rare", we shall collect it ![]() https://youtu.be/-1MQQ5gBnWo |
||
Post 49 IP flag post |
![]() |
ZosoRocks private msg quote post Address this user | |
LOL..."let the buyer beware"...one must be alert and focused. | ||
Post 50 IP flag post |
![]() |
dielinfinite private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Jesse_O That sounds about right. A 1" tear alone would apparently drop an otherwise perfect book into the 4.0 territory, nevermind the other defects |
||
Post 51 IP flag post |
This topic is archived. Start new topic?