Not a CBCS member yet? Join now »
CBCS Comics
Not a CBCS member yet? Join now »
You can't get good wood on the ball every time. HotKeyComics private msg quote post Address this user
Horrible decision and another big hit to their reputation.
There is no positive side to this from a buyers perspective. Only downside.
Post 26 IP   flag post
Thank you sir. May I have another? Siggy private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertofredrico
...he's asking would the CBCS label (in this scenario) say "large piece cut out" or something more specific like "Wolverine figure cut out".


Quote:
Originally Posted by sborock
Large piece cut out


Quote:
Originally Posted by sborock
This is so bad for our hobby!
We could use more information not less.

Indeed.
Post 27 IP   flag post
I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this. GAC private msg quote post Address this user
Isn't reducing the defects listed on labels just another way of saying they're hiding the defects?

I know it should appear in Graders Notes but there's a significant # of books with no Graders Notes. Weird.
Post 28 IP   flag post
Masculinity takes a holiday. EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user
I guess there is really no guarantee that those significant defects were ever on the label in the first place. Now it's just a guarantee that they won't be. Meaning that now after-market buyers of CGC books will need to do the homework that we should have been doing in the first place. It will be interesting for those of us who don't have access to grader notes. I guess we will have to ask the seller to supply them to us. Which of course assumes that the seller is the original submitter or has a CGC account. What a freaking mess.
Post 29 IP   flag post
The Fifth Golden Girl sborock private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotKeyComics

There is no positive side to this from a buyers perspective. Only downside.


This!
Post 30 IP   flag post


Captain Accident the420bandito private msg quote post Address this user
I thought the entire point of getting an item graded was so you have more information on its condition.
Post 31 IP   flag post
" . " Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user
Any material defects not visible on the outside should ideally be listed. I think removing the obvious is fine (maybe half or two-thirds of that list).

More ideal is a small print list on the back of the label as others mentioned. For a specific set of defect types only.

Reducing disclosures is short-sighted. It actually drives values down in the long run.
Post 32 IP   flag post
Collector sly private msg quote post Address this user
I pay money so that a grading company provides specific reasons why a book has a certain grade.
On every 25 books I get graded I'm lucky if CGC offers graders notes on two of them.
Now they are removing the defects on the label...where the heck is someone without an account going to get this information ? The dealer? Not everyone will be honest.

WHAT A SAD DAY ....BEST TO LEAVE A BOOK RAW AT THIS POINT !
Post 33 IP   flag post
Masculinity takes a holiday. EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by sborock
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotKeyComics

There is no positive side to this from a buyers perspective. Only downside.


This!


Say that in reverse. There's no downside to this from a sellers perspective. Only upside. It may be perverse, but CGC is not confused about who their customer is.
Post 34 IP   flag post
If I could, I would. I swear. DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siggy
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertofredrico
...he's asking would the CBCS label (in this scenario) say "large piece cut out" or something more specific like "Wolverine figure cut out".


Quote:
Originally Posted by sborock
Large piece cut out


Quote:
Originally Posted by sborock
This is so bad for our hobby!
We could use more information not less.

Indeed.

At least "Large piece cut out." on the label is better than, "We aren't listing anything on the label. Go pay for a membership and find it for yourself in the 'free' grader's notes... if it's there."
Post 35 IP   flag post
Masculinity takes a holiday. EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user
At least now we will get to find out which "prominent members of the collecting community" have larceny in their hearts.
Post 36 IP   flag post
Captain Corrector CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user
.
What about the prior notion that grader’s notes weren’t really meant for customers and were only meant to be used between graders?
Post 37 IP   flag post
Masculinity takes a holiday. EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck
.
What about the prior notion that grader’s notes weren’t really meant for customers and were only meant to be used between graders?


It seems that the change in that policy/notion is how they are justifying the removal of major flaw information from the labels.
Post 38 IP   flag post
If I could, I would. I swear. DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck
.
What about the prior notion that grader’s notes weren’t really meant for customers and were only meant to be used between graders?

That changed when they went from inter-office notes to a sellable commodity.
Post 39 IP   flag post
Collector 50AE_DE private msg quote post Address this user
This is not good. This doesn't benefit anyone but those that have something they don't want on the label.
Post 40 IP   flag post
Where's his Bat-package? Byrdibyrd private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by 50AE_DE
This is not good. This doesn't benefit anyone but those that have something they don't want on the label.

YES. Like this right here ^
Post 41 IP   flag post
Suckin' on a chili dog
Outside the Tastee Freez.
RexMuff private msg quote post Address this user
There’s really no reason the Grading Notes can’t be on the back of the label.
Post 42 IP   flag post
Captain Corrector CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user
.
Funny how these “prominent members of the collecting community” haven’t instructed them to lower their prices or fix the Newton ring issue.
Post 43 IP   flag post
I'd like to say I still turned out alright, but that would be a lie. flanders private msg quote post Address this user
Yet another reason why CBCS will be just fine. I think I'll pass on any cgc graded items post 2021.
Post 44 IP   flag post
Collector 50AE_DE private msg quote post Address this user
If these "prominent members of the community" are dealers, which they probably are, and they have that much pull to change their policies then I'd think that's a huge conflict of interest.
Post 45 IP   flag post
Captain Corrector CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scifinator
@CaptainCanuck @Byrdibyrd - the "prominent members of the collecting community" are likely executives at cgc and Blackstone.
^ @Scifinator may have already identified these “prominent members”.
Post 46 IP   flag post
Collector robertofredrico private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by sborock
This is so bad for our hobby!
We could use more information not less.



But isn't this just a continuation of your policies from when you were with the company?

For instance, the first couple of years CGC was open, there would be notes printed on the label like "Date stamp on back cover", "1"4 tear on 8th page" and "Small rust on bottom staple".

After a couple of years, notes like that went away, and were simply put in the graders notes and/or considered not worth mentioning on the label because regardless of whatever the defect may have been, it was of course factored into the grade.

Isn't this just broadening the scope of "defects not being put on the label anymore" that started during your tenure?
Post 47 IP   flag post
The apple sauce and pudding were the best part... Bronte private msg quote post Address this user
Funny. Less information and this is on top of 9.2 books and above with no graders notes to begin with.
Post 48 IP   flag post
You can't get good wood on the ball every time. HotKeyComics private msg quote post Address this user
I can't even imagine how many reholders they are going to get for Hulk 181s missing the MVS now.

Don't buy anything with a MVS that is graded by CGC in 2022 and beyond.
Post 49 IP   flag post
The apple sauce and pudding were the best part... Bronte private msg quote post Address this user
In theory, wouldn't the book still have green label? If that's the case I still wouldn't buy it without somehow looking up the notes. In my view, this labeling issue mainly affects blue label books. Green and purple I wouldn't really touch to begin with.
Post 50 IP   flag post
I blame the forum gremlins. figment private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by flanders
Yet another reason why CBCS will be just fine. I think I'll pass on any cgc graded items post 2021.


I'm already wary of CGC books that have a serial number starting with 3 or 4, now even more so.
Post 51 IP   flag post
If the viagra is working you should be well over a 9.8. xkonk private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bronte
In theory, wouldn't the book still have green label? If that's the case I still wouldn't buy it without somehow looking up the notes. In my view, this labeling issue mainly affects blue label books. Green and purple I wouldn't really touch to begin with.


Right, my reading of the announcement isn't that grading standards are changing, just what they put on the label. So a book could be green label or low grade and it won't be obvious why.
Post 52 IP   flag post
Collector robertofredrico private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotKeyComics
I can't even imagine how many reholders they are going to get for Hulk 181s missing the MVS now.

Don't buy anything with a MVS that is graded by CGC in 2022 and beyond.



According to the release, parts of a comic that are missing (a panel, a page, a wrap, an insert, a MVS) will still be noted on the label.
Post 53 IP   flag post
Captain Corrector CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bronte
In theory, wouldn't the book still have green label? If that's the case I still wouldn't buy it without somehow looking up the notes. In my view, this labeling issue mainly affects blue label books. Green and purple I wouldn't really touch to begin with.

Here’s a Universal label with a missing MVS.


Post 54 IP   flag post
Masculinity takes a holiday. EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user
One thing that’s been bugging me with this label change is the “why” of it. I’ve got a decent business background and usually when there’s an unexpected change like this I can think it through and figure out the business benefit. In this case I can’t. There was nothing broken that needed fixing. It’s not going to change their revenues or profits. I can’t figure out any business rationale for this. The only thing I can guess is that it’s for the personal benefit of some well connected individuals. Individuals who could have easily been buying up and hoarding these type of books in advance of this announcement.
Post 55 IP   flag post
623284 72 30
This topic is archived. Start new topic?