Not a CBCS member yet? Join now »
CBCS Comics
Not a CBCS member yet? Join now »
I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this. GAC private msg quote post Address this user
I think it serves more as a warning to participants that the topic of conversation is a slippery slope and could get locked if we're not careful.
Post 51 IP   flag post
PLOD theCapraAegagrus private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfoster43
Quote:
Originally Posted by theCapraAegagrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfoster43
Or am I overthinking this?

It's the comment form of Marvel Premiere #31.


The Woodgod issue? In Before The Lock? Not seeing the connection.

Is it something about how it was first put out at 25 cents and then changed to 30 cents?

Now I am really confused. But I'll just be quiet. I think I've flaunted my ignorance enough for the day, LOL!

Dreck comic meets dreck comment.
Post 52 IP   flag post
Forum Crier OGJackster private msg quote post Address this user
In the name of diversity, I say why not? Saying it's in an alternate universe is a great way to explain it all away. All little kids want to be their heroes. That's why everyone in the media business is putting it all out there on TV, movies, and comic books. LGBTQ, black, white, Asian, Native American, and anyone else they can think of. Even Santa Clause. $$$! Don't forget, we're talking about fictional characters (except Santa).
Post 53 IP   flag post
PLOD theCapraAegagrus private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by OGJackster
In the name of diversity, I say why not?

If we're talking about Clark Kent, then exploitation for representation would be my criticism.

If we're talking about Val-Zod, or Calvin Ellis, or Steel then I would agree; Why not?
Post 54 IP   flag post
Captain Corrector CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAC
I think it serves more as a warning to participants that the topic of conversation is a slippery slope and could get locked if we're not careful.

In that case, one “IBTL” would suffice. There’s more to it.
Post 55 IP   flag post


I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this. GAC private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAC
I think it serves more as a warning to participants that the topic of conversation is a slippery slope and could get locked if we're not careful.

In that case, one “IBTL” would suffice. There’s more to it.


If a moderator typed IBTL, then I'd agree that one would suffice....coming from the general masses, an IBTL is simply an opinion to be given the weight it deserves.
Post 56 IP   flag post
" . " Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAC
I think it serves more as a warning to participants that the topic of conversation is a slippery slope and could get locked if we're not careful.


Every topic today is a slippery slope. The irony is the slippery slope against discussing much of anything has ironically blh blah blah blah blah blh.

Sorry, I definitely over-quote Alex Lifeson.

In the words (lyrics) of the late great Peart: “Life is like a box of chocolates…”
Post 57 IP   flag post
" . " Davethebrave private msg quote post Address this user



Oooops mixed them up again.

Oh and Loki!

To all those saying “In Before the Loki”… you made it!
Post 58 IP   flag post
I don't believe this....and I know you don't care that I don't believe this. GAC private msg quote post Address this user
@Davethebrave where's Alex?
Post 59 IP   flag post
Collector xvipah private msg quote post Address this user
From what I understand, there's both a Calvin Ellis and a Val-Zod show being pushed. Val-Zod is the Michael B. Jordan one for HBO Max. Not sure about the Calvin Ellis stuff.

And really, just, who cares? If he can fly, beat up bad guys, and get killed by a green rock, I like it as a Superman movie. I mean, as much as anyone can like a Superman movie after Superman 2.

Quote:
Originally Posted by theCapraAegagrus

If we're talking about Clark Kent, then exploitation for representation would be my criticism.

If we're talking about Val-Zod, or Calvin Ellis, or Steel then I would agree; Why not?
Post 60 IP   flag post
past performance is no guarantee of future actions. KatKomics private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by xvipah
I mean, as much as anyone can like a Superman movie after Superman 2.



right!!!???

Should have stopped after 1980!!
Post 61 IP   flag post
Collector* Towmater private msg quote post Address this user
On reflection, I should have added that I’m for any Superman property that Synder isn’t a part of or has a hand in. More than likely it will be a huge improvement over the stinkers he made people sit through.
Post 62 IP   flag post
Leftover Sundae Gnus CatmanAmerica private msg quote post Address this user
New to this topic and realize it’s a minefield. I doubt that I’ll be able to diffuse any hair-triggers as a die-hard traditionalist who doesn’t believe in fiddling with legacy heroes. My POV is that re-envisioning traditional heroes as alternative universe characters is disingenuous and risks losing essential aspects of those characters which drew an audience in the first place.

As a strong advocate of diversity in film and literature I believe the best approach is creating new heroes with their own unique and interesting storylines. By approaching the issue this way the original characters aren’t disrespected or written off and neither is their audience. Diversity should be about the bold and new, not trying to change the past. Heck, I still like the George Reeves version of Superman.
.
Post 63 IP   flag post
Collector Haljordanfan private msg quote post Address this user
I’m calling for a White Panther and a White Man-Ape. Let’s someone pull that off. 👍
Post 64 IP   flag post
I'll probably wake up constipated. Pre_Coder private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by CatmanAmerica
New to this topic and realize it’s a minefield. I doubt that I’ll be able to diffuse any hair-triggers as a die-hard traditionalist who doesn’t believe in fiddling with legacy heroes. My POV is that re-envisioning traditional heroes as alternative universe characters is disingenuous and risks losing essential aspects of those characters which drew an audience in the first place.

As a strong advocate of diversity in film and literature I believe the best approach is creating new heroes with their own unique and interesting storylines. By approaching the issue this way the original characters aren’t disrespected or written off and neither is their audience. Diversity should be about the bold and new, not trying to change the past. Heck, I still like the George Reeves version of Superman.
.

This!
Post 65 IP   flag post
Keep your $6.87 bro... not even saving tax with that. Cli4dR3D0g private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by CatmanAmerica
New to this topic and realize it’s a minefield. I doubt that I’ll be able to diffuse any hair-triggers as a die-hard traditionalist who doesn’t believe in fiddling with legacy heroes. My POV is that re-envisioning traditional heroes as alternative universe characters is disingenuous and risks losing essential aspects of those characters which drew an audience in the first place.

As a strong advocate of diversity in film and literature I believe the best approach is creating new heroes with their own unique and interesting storylines. By approaching the issue this way the original characters aren’t disrespected or written off and neither is their audience. Diversity should be about the bold and new, not trying to change the past. Heck, I still like the George Reeves version of Superman.
.


Six check marks if I could.
Post 66 IP   flag post
Not trying to be an ass since February 12, 2020. HulkSmash private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haljordanfan
I’m calling for a White Panther and a White Man-Ape. Let’s someone pull that off. 👍


Luca Cade: Gyro for hire

See what I did there?
Post 67 IP   flag post
Collector Darkseid_of_town private msg quote post Address this user
Everyone gets their laundry shuffled at the idea of a black superman, but meantime we have female spiderpeople, female wolverines, harleys that look nothing like the original character, and even Batman who looks like a BDSM freak and is evil....the MCU gave us Samuel L as Nick Fury, a normally white character? In thee most current supergirl we have a Jimmy olsen that is black...and the series does alright for itself...but make an actual established hero another color and the train goes off the tracks...odd. I mean who cares....alternate earths, alternate dimensions, different stories (legends of tomorrow white canary anyone?) and different characters, its all cheese being served on the same buffet...just eat what you like and ignore the rest
Post 68 IP   flag post
PLOD theCapraAegagrus private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by xvipah
And really, just, who cares? If he can fly, beat up bad guys, and get killed by a green rock, I like it as a Superman movie. I mean, as much as anyone can like a Superman movie after Superman 2.

By that metric, there's no need for criticism of any movie derived from a source material. Accuracy/faithfulness matters to most people.
Post 69 IP   flag post
Collector xvipah private msg quote post Address this user
Exactly. You want to say a movie is bad - horrible acting, horrible script? All valid. You want to criticize cause you don't like a derivation from your beloved characters... move on, life's too short.

Quote:
Originally Posted by theCapraAegagrus

By that metric, there's no need for criticism of any movie derived from a source material. Accuracy/faithfulness matters to most people.
Post 70 IP   flag post
PLOD theCapraAegagrus private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by xvipah
Exactly. You want to say a movie is bad - horrible acting, horrible script? All valid. You want to criticize cause you don't like a derivation from your beloved characters... move on, life's too short.

Race-swapping a character is lazy and horrible writing. There are black Supermen to draw inspiration from. None of their names are Clark Kent.
Post 71 IP   flag post
Collector xvipah private msg quote post Address this user
And none of the black superman projects being talked about are Clark Kent...

Quote:
Originally Posted by theCapraAegagrus

Race-swapping a character is lazy and horrible writing. There are black Supermen to draw inspiration from. None of their names are Clark Kent.
Post 72 IP   flag post
PLOD theCapraAegagrus private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by xvipah
And none of the black superman projects being talked about are Clark Kent...

You mean except for the J.J. Abrams movie...?
Post 73 IP   flag post
Collector xvipah private msg quote post Address this user
Maybe. We'll see what happens I suppose.

I guess I just don't understand why it matters. But, that's fine, I don't haveta understand everything
Post 74 IP   flag post
PLOD theCapraAegagrus private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by xvipah
Maybe. We'll see what happens I suppose.

I guess I just don't understand why it matters. But, that's fine, I don't haveta understand everything

Faithfulness and not exploiting people matters. I am as interested in a black Clark Kent as much as a white T'Challa. The mantles can change; Superman, Spider-Man, Black Panther, Wolverine, etc. Write a new character to fill that role and make them interesting. Don't rewrite history to exploit people for representation, though. I'm infinitely more interested in original characters like J'onn J'onzz, Victor Stone, and John Stewart.

MBJ's Val-Zod deserves a fair shake, though.
Post 75 IP   flag post
Collector xvipah private msg quote post Address this user
Not exploiting people I can buy, if the only reason to have a black Clark Kent is to get the black people to pay for your movie that's pretty low.

But faithfulness I'm not buying. These are comic book characters. Aside from basically their race, EVERYTHING changes about them over the years. From powers, to attitudes, to partners, to names. To me the idea of being "faithful" to a comic book character is akin to the idea of being faithful to what color a chameleon is at any given point.
Post 76 IP   flag post
PLOD theCapraAegagrus private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by xvipah
But faithfulness I'm not buying... To me the idea of being "faithful" to a comic book character is akin to the idea of being faithful to what color a chameleon is at any given point.

Do you work for Warner Bros? LOL.
Post 77 IP   flag post
Collector xvipah private msg quote post Address this user
I wish, I could use a little bit of that WB money.

Quote:
Originally Posted by theCapraAegagrus

Do you work for Warner Bros? LOL.
Post 78 IP   flag post
If the viagra is working you should be well over a 9.8. xkonk private msg quote post Address this user
I'm still waiting for actors who can be faithful to Sam Keith's artwork. I hope the next guy they hire to play Wolverine looks like a triangle.
Post 79 IP   flag post
Collector dfoster43 private msg quote post Address this user
Quote:
Originally Posted by xkonk
I'm still waiting for actors who can be faithful to Sam Keith's artwork. I hope the next guy they hire to play Wolverine looks like a triangle.


I'm still waiting for them to cast actors with little tiny pointed feet and 10,000 pouches on their costumes.

What was the name of that shit artist from the 90's Marvel books, couldn't draw legs or feet to save his life, always made people look hairy and steroidal .. my GOD did he suck.

I think he did Cable a lot ... X-Force maybe .. man he KILLED certain titles for me. I literally stopped buying anything with that talentless jack-wagon's touch to it.
Post 80 IP   flag post
642928 106 30
This topic is archived. Start new topic?