Is discussing CGC allowed?14404
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by chester15 No I sent the email in the picture before your post. Their response reveals whether they are, not an answer to the explicit question Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 It's not a conspiracy, several members in unison admitted that an employee once revealed in an interview that paper age is factored. I trust their members, who have been there over 15 years. If you don't find it unethical that this is not disclosed on the page CGC directs the public to view their grading criteria, then you simply do not grasp what's ethical or not Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 What is it that you think will happen here? You mean if the reply I get from CBCS in the email I sent that you bizarrely ignored when asking me what email I was going to send indicates they are being unethical and I point it out I will be banned? Are you a moderator or something, or speaking for others? |
||
Post 26 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by EbayMafia What're TAT's? Edit: NVM figured it's turnaround times |
||
Post 27 IP flag post |
![]() |
flanders private msg quote post Address this user | |
Keep in mind CBCS is extremely busy at the moment. If you don't get a response it doesn't mean they're ignoring you, it means they have thousands of other things to do that are far higher priority. | ||
Post 28 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Thanks I'm in no rush this is just for science | ||
Post 29 IP flag post |
![]() |
EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by adamlui I think it's fair to consider grade inflation without accusation. I've always assumed that natural business bias could help the grades of the larger customers who have a relationship with the company and are in daily communication. When I buy a CGC graded book from a dealer that I know is a large submitter, I will inspect it more critically. But until a whistle-blower comes out and says that it was company policy, I have to assume that it's nothing more than a natural bias...if it's there at all. |
||
Post 30 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
I didn't get what you meant by it's fair to consider grade inflation without accusation sorry, you mean it's fair to consider inflated grades were result of bias not policy so don't accuse them? Because several long-term members (15+ years) revealed that a company representative admitted it was the result of policy (to give higher grade to older books) not bias, so it's not an "accusation" | ||
Post 31 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
An opinion was formed that not revealing this policy publicly was unethical, no accusations were made because long-time members of the site itself agreed that it was policy | ||
Post 32 IP flag post |
![]() |
chester15 private msg quote post Address this user | |
@adamlui - CGC tells you almost NOTHING about what determines a grade, and they like it that way, just for the reasons that you bring up. They don't need people nit-picking, dissecting, or analyzing their methods. You pay for a grade, they grade it. If you don't like it, don't believe it's correct, don't like the slab, whatever, too bad. Don't send stuff in, don't buy their finished product, stay away. If you believe a company that is incompetent is inherently unethical, well, that's fine. They can do what they want - it's a free country. This isn't some government agency with oversight where you can complain to your congressman. You're tilting at windmills. |
||
Post 33 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
They said it was revealed in some interview but no one linked me to it, they have no reason to lie about it they referred to the employee using the same nickname as if he was truly interviewed by the mods or something | ||
Post 34 IP flag post |
![]() |
EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user | |
@adamlui I'm not disagreeing with you, I suspect there is grade inflation that would encourage the most important customers to send very valuable books to CGC. I even believe you that insiders have discussed it in private conversations. But until someone with first-hand information actually goes on public record, it's more rumor and hearsay than anything else. Which doesn't make it untrue, it just makes it unprovable. | ||
Post 35 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by chester15 This is simply untrue. Both of the major comic grading services list pages upon pages of high-level criteria for what determines a grade. CBCS's can be found here: https://www.cbcscomics.com/comics-grading-scale CGC's can be found here: https://www.cgccomics.com/grading/grading-scale/ Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 WDYM they don't "need" you lost me there. I'm a owner of their products I have the right to analyze my vendors as I so please. Grading is about the customer's needs. Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 I don't do any of these things, how come you're telling me as someone who doesn't do any of those things what seems to be your limited view of having no recourse when your comics are misgraded (quite unfortunate for you I must say but you have great recourse in actuality, you can re-grade it or even expose a service if something unethical is going on) @chester15 Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 Not sure why you're telling me what's "fine" or not, I don't exactly need your permission for the email I already sent to their CEO hinting at my intentions to make a video on my Verified YT channel and share the bizarre incident with members of the press (contacts acquired from campaigning against my state's governor for mishandling COVID for nearly a year) |
||
Post 36 IP flag post |
![]() |
flanders private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by EbayMafia @adamlui With this in mind, what you should do is move to Florida (assuming you don't already live there) and apply for a job at CGC. Play it cool for several years until you climb the CGC corporate ladder and then you can disclose all of their secrets. |
||
Post 37 IP flag post |
![]() |
chester15 private msg quote post Address this user | |
A lot of the grading standards were derived from Overstreet Grading Definitions. Overstreet makes allowances for Golden Age. For example: "9.4 Near Mint, Bindery tears must be less than 1/16" on Silver Age and later books, although on Golden Age books bindery tears of up to 1/4" have been noted." So one employee (maybe ex-employee) made an accusation. Out of how many thousands of employees over the years? |
||
Post 38 IP flag post |
![]() |
EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by chester15 @chester15 If it were actually established that a 3rd party grader was systemically grading favorably for specific customers...that would lead to some pretty serious issues in both Criminal and Civil courts. That's why I think it's important to avoid allegations without actual evidence. |
||
Post 39 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by EbayMafia It's already on semi-public record. The three members have been with CGC for over a decade, there is 0% chance they made up the fact that an "interview" with the employee revealed CGC increases grades for older books. Why would they lie about it? I don't think you understand, if they knew the ramifications then they would try to keep it a secret, but it's clear that I will be able to find this "interview" when I'm ready to contact the press (I like to spend some time gathering all my screenshots) |
||
Post 40 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by flanders It's not a secret I don't need to join CGC an employee already posted about it on the forum, there is no conspiracy occurring if members of its own forum (including those with no gripe with me) are all saying it happened... |
||
Post 41 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by chester15 Noted means just that, noted.. Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 No accusations were made, simply a proud revelation that CGC will give you a higher grade if the book is older, I don't know why this is so complicated to you |
||
Post 42 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Accusation implies something bad, they're not saying it's bad they're proud of it | ||
Post 43 IP flag post |
![]() |
chester15 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Wow, this is an expose! (sorry, don't know how to make the accent over the last e) No one cares. And by the way, you were the one who accused me early on that I do not "grasp what is ethical or not". I'll decide what my own ethical standards involve, not you. Bottom line is WE DON'T CARE. About your outrage, nor about your verified Y-Tube channel. |
||
Post 44 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
But if you don't care why do you keep tagging me I'm so confused | ||
Post 45 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
And of course you decide your own ethical standards, I simply pointed out after you tagged me as someone who doesn't care you don't grasp them to think it's ethical to not reveal to the public that a grade is higher for older books | ||
Post 46 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Also how come you speak for everyone with the "WE" either you or someone else did that earlier, too Edit: NVM it was you again lol |
||
Post 47 IP flag post |
![]() |
chester15 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by EbayMafia I agree that there can be no favoritism, but that is not the point of contention here. CGC must be equally incompetent to all customers. I do believe their recent grading traumas are due to not having enough help. When there are signing bonuses at all levels, that's a clue. About factoring in age of paper, don't know, don't care. |
||
Post 48 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
BTW my mention of my verified YouTube channel that seems to have upset you was in direct response to you tagging me to tell me to essentially "deal with it." Everyone deals with things in their own ways. I repeat, you may think there's no recourse when bad things happen but not everyone is in the same position as you. | ||
Post 49 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Also if you don't care then don't offer crass suggestions I didn't even ask for, just to be angered when my reply reveals I actually have more recourse than you thought / are used to yourself | ||
Post 50 IP flag post |
![]() |
EbayMafia private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by adamlui Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought it was about increasing grades for specific clients. As far as grading older books more favorably, yeah I assume that's typical and I'm ok with it as long as it's consistent from one client to the next. |
||
Post 51 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by EbayMafia Increasing for clients will be a tough thing to prove but doing it to specific-era books without disclosing it publicly is bad for collecting because collectors will look at the page that publicly lists the criteria and not see age factor being mentioned anywhere, then when they resell it lose money due to this deceptive practice if the buyer is more privy to the policy from being a member of a proprietary board from ten years ago |
||
Post 52 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
But the financial incentive is just too great for them to publicly disclose little things like that which increase grade for all customers, knowing no one who likes money would complain | ||
Post 53 IP flag post |
![]() |
chester15 private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by adamlui "Noted" means found, or observed, in this grade. A different standard for the older book. Why would Overstreet even bring it up if it wasn't meant as an exception? "Both of the major comic grading services list pages upon pages of high-level criteria for what determines a grade." There's like one sentence for each grade on the CGC page you reference, which I had already viewed to make sure it hadn't changed from it's Spartan approach. This isn't complicated. The only one who cares about your "revelation" is you. Most people know that GA books get a bit of a nod in some aspects. I'm sure GA collectors would like to have high grade books, but if 8.0 was the cream of the crop, it doesn't seem too exciting. So maybe it's graded on a bit of a curve. The dollar values will follow the same curve. I have a few GA books. Maybe I'll send those 4.0's in and scoop up a few 7.5 grades while the "getting is good". Before the big revelation hits prime time. |
||
Post 54 IP flag post |
![]() |
adamlui private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by chester15 If Overstreet mentions something was "noted" in a grade they're not giving a guideline but an observation. Even if you view what you pasted as guideline, it's still a public disclosure so there's nothing unethical / destructive about what Overstreet's doing Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 The "one sentence for each grade" adding up to over 20 sentences is hardly the "almost NOTHING about what determines a grade" you originally claimed Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 You seem to care deeply after proclaiming that not just you, but EVERYONE doesn't, to be continuing quoting and dissecting my quotes exactly like I do to others now XD Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 Again, grandiosely speaking on behalf of others Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 That's a terrible reason why deceptive grades should be allowed. That's like saying, "No one can have a Mona Lisa and owning Monets is not exciting as the cream of the crop... let's call them all Mona Lisa's" Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 No it won't have you heard of PGX? It will eventually catch up to the services that do it (especially without so much a public disclosure) Quote: Originally Posted by chester15 That would only work if you sell it before my attrition attains a critical level of exposure. Until I find out if CBCS is the same way my speed of action is yet to be determined. |
||
Post 55 IP flag post |
This topic is archived. Start new topic?