I vote to abolish grades 9.2, 9.4, 9.6, 9.81293
Collector | Wacker23 private msg quote post Address this user | |
If it aint broke, dont fix it. | ||
Post 26 IP flag post |
Collector | Darkga private msg quote post Address this user | |
Of course my thread was mostly tongue in cheek, but anything that starts a good discussion is worth it. It's fun to add a little excitement to a forum whose main topic is the condition of pieces of paper. | ||
Post 27 IP flag post |
COLLECTOR | conditionfreak private msg quote post Address this user | |
All just passing time, and sharing the hobby. But telling the difference between a 9.9 and a 9.6 is relatively easy. Telling the difference between a 9.8 and a 9.9 is a lot tougher. At least in my experience. Like the label says. It is opinion and subjective. It is not science, or written in stone. A Mint book today, nothing like a mint book of yesteryear. And it will change again in the future. I am sure of that. Heck, if I remember correctly. Overstreet never went past NM in their guide. But like I said. All in enjoying a discussion about the hobby. There are no absolute right or wrong answers when it comes to close grades. I remember an Action Comics #1 that was clearly a .5, or at best a 1.0,that was given a 2.5 by CGC. Even though the grading standards have not been changed since then (as far as we know). Borock later said it was a mistake, or he regretted it, or something like that (while at CGC). Big book probably was a factor, I think. Which is not supposed to figure into the equation. But what else could it have been. |
||
Post 28 IP flag post |
Collector | CopperAgeKids private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by DrWatson Steve Ricketts is absolutely right. CBCS and CGC do not dole out 9.9's and 10's to those who "kiss ass".Or for any other reason than that the book in question merits the assigned grade of 9.9 or 10. Both grading companies safegaurd the 9.9/10 grades.It is in CGC's and CBCS's best interest to do so, not the other way around.If CGC/CBCS were the slightest bit loose in "doling out" 9.9 or 10's, they would quickly lose market confidence. PGX...not so much. That is why PGX 9.9 and 10 books aren't worth a damn in the open market. |
||
Post 29 IP flag post |
Collector | manwithoutfear private msg quote post Address this user | |
I might be able to discern what the grading companies think 9.4-9.8 is, but honestly there is not much difference. I saw a post where someone said 9.8 prices were taking a hit recently. I think that would be a good thing. The prices they commanded were a bit silly honestly. 9 or above is great in any age. |
||
Post 30 IP flag post |
Collector | Darkga private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by manwithoutfear I agree. A minor, hard to spot spine tick should not half the value of something. Either the 9.8 value is inflated or the 9.6 value should not be that far off. I'm slowly becoming more accepting of my collection not being all 9.8, but I do upgrade copies when I can if reasonable. |
||
Post 31 IP flag post |
Why just the women? I like bears. | Gaard private msg quote post Address this user | |
Reading this thread got me thinking... I'm pretty sure when I was a kid back in the '70s there were no numbers for grades. So, when was the number system established? and why? Did it have to do with $$? |
||
Post 32 IP flag post |
Collector | Jerkfro private msg quote post Address this user | |
Let us go one step further and abolish all grading companies | ||
Post 33 IP flag post |
If I could, I would. I swear. | DrWatson private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Gaard Giving something a numerical value makes it easier to quantify. This, in turn, makes it easier to assign value and transform something into a commodity. As a result, one can assign value along 27 different price points instead of the ten or so grades on the traditional scale. So, yes, it has to do with money. |
||
Post 34 IP flag post |
COLLECTOR | conditionfreak private msg quote post Address this user | |
Always, always, always, follow the money. Religion, politics, legal system, collectors, love, you name it. | ||
Post 35 IP flag post |
Collector | BrianGreensnips private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by conditionfreak |
||
Post 36 IP flag post |
Collector | BrianGreensnips private msg quote post Address this user | |
The Overstreet Grading Book shows an accumilation of flaws that a particular grade could have. I believe it is shown as a graph or chart in the book which is not with me currently. I think the grading scale should be left as is. For me, I find the books around fine to very fine the hardest to grade accurately. | ||
Post 37 IP flag post |
COLLECTOR | JWKyle private msg quote post Address this user | |
It could have worked out a little different http://comicgrader.com/#newsflash |
||
Post 38 IP flag post |
This topic is archived. Start new topic?