Snyder "Justice League" to be Released in 202111971

Originally Posted by 00slim
What I’m wondering is, will this be the full story?

In the original press release, ‘Justice League’ was announced as a two part film.

clickable text

Now, when the film changed hands, or perhaps even before that, the plan was changed to make it a single film.

But, did Snyder film everything he needed? Is this 3 1/2 cut the full story he planned? If it ends on a cliffhanger for a part two that will never happen, what’s the point?

My expectations are low for this, but if it’s the whole story, I’ll at least pick it up on Blu-Ray when it’s $10 or less.

Originally Posted by dpiercy
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wraith
Snyder still did Batman vs superman .. which is arguably worse than the cinema cut of justice league

Oh, it most certainly is. Again, JL was better than movies like Iron Man 2 and Age of Ultron.

Originally Posted by Towmater
Quote:

Originally Posted by 00slim
The ultimate cute of BvS is watchable. That’s the highest compliment I can give it. They tried.

I didn’t like Iron Man 2 or Age of Ultron, but if i had to choose, I’d still choose one of those.

Oh, the Martha scene.

Originally Posted by Wraith
Disagree.. admittedly the movie was a bit silly and badly written before hitting that scene .. but that one scene totally obliterated any chance of redemption.

Was completely moronic. I literally laughed out loud and switched it off and came back a few weeks later to finish where I left off. But while finishing think got distracted with other more interesting things , like cleaning the cat litter

Originally Posted by theCapraAegagrus
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wraith
Disagree.. admittedly the movie was a bit silly and badly written before hitting that scene .. but that one scene totally obliterated any chance of redemption.

Was completely moronic. I literally laughed out loud and switched it off and came back a few weeks later to finish where I left off. But while finishing think got distracted with other more interesting things , like cleaning the cat litter

Not really. They set it up well. Apparently you don't understand it.

It's not perfect, but, it does make sense.

Originally Posted by 00slim
Quote:

Originally Posted by theCapraAegagrus
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wraith
Disagree.. admittedly the movie was a bit silly and badly written before hitting that scene .. but that one scene totally obliterated any chance of redemption.

Was completely moronic. I literally laughed out loud and switched it off and came back a few weeks later to finish where I left off. But while finishing think got distracted with other more interesting things , like cleaning the cat litter

Not really. They set it up well. Apparently you don't understand it.

It's not perfect, but, it does make sense.

Let’s not degrade the discussion to personal insults. He was calling out the movie, not you as a person.

Originally Posted by theCapraAegagrus
Quote:

Originally Posted by 00slim
I’m saying he should have been better written and developed throughout the movie. Snyder had plans for him to be more menacing in other films? Cool.

It doesn’t change the fact that he brings down the movie in every scene he’s in.

There’s really no point in discussing it further. I have too many issues with the movie. I’m glad you found joy in it.

The people who have problems with Lex's origin are likely the same as those who don't like Man of Steel. You may or may not be one of those viewers, but, the criticism is certainly identical.

Worlds of DC wasn't intended to be 'more of the same' stuff.

Superman's origin was intended to ground him in humanity, so the ideal that everyone 'should' strive towards would have compelling elements. "People hate what they don't understand."

Lex is the same. Do you empathize with a billionaire who blindly hates a powerful alien-god (like classic Luthor)? What about a guy who struggles with the idea of an all-powerful god who did nothing to help/save him? Motivations matter. He struggles with his own disturbed disillusioned philosophies. He's obviously no Thanos, and we're naturally inclined to divert from his mentality, but intended on making him relatable on some levels.

This all falls on deaf ears if you don't care, of course.

Originally Posted by Darkseid_of_town

When someone does not agree with a given viewpoint, implying they "don't understand it" is not only insulting, it is condescending.....I agree with Slim

Originally Posted by theCapraAegagrus
Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkseid_of_town

When someone does not agree with a given viewpoint, implying they "don't understand it" is not only insulting, it is condescending.....I agree with Slim

There are no implications. S/he obviously does not understand it.

If you watch a movie about calculating a Goldilocks Zone, and you call the theory of hydrogen fusion "moronic", then you don't understand thermonuclear astrophysics.

It's not an insult. Don't cry wolf.