Strange Academy first appearance?11443
Pages:
1
![]() |
OGJackster private msg quote post Address this user | |
Marvel fandom has the Strange Academy first appearance as #1 of Strange Academy that was released March 4, 2020. clickable text ![]() Here's the question, Miles Morales: Spider-Man #15 was released February 5, 2020, and has a 9 or 10-page preview of Strange Academy in it. Wouldn't that count as the first appearance as it came out prior to SA #1? ![]() |
||
Post 1 IP flag post |
![]() |
poka private msg quote post Address this user | |
@OGJackster while there are people who collects previews for first appearances they are in general not considered 1st appearance. | ||
Post 2 IP flag post |
![]() |
dielinfinite private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by pokaYup! Another example being Preacher #1 being generally considered the first appearance despite the Vertigo preview. |
||
Post 3 IP flag post |
![]() |
BrashSmurf private msg quote post Address this user | |
i think a preview only counts if its a preview of the actual book White widow #1 exists and is not the first appearance of white widow, a preview of white widow was sold at NYCC months before Sad Girl psycho Baby Preview lists as her first appearance and not Sad Girl #1 So i think title previews count while other previews do not |
||
Post 4 IP flag post |
![]() |
OGJackster private msg quote post Address this user | |
Here is the Miles Morales: Spider-Man #15 preview of Strange Academy #1... Looks like a first appearance to me...![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Post 5 IP flag post |
![]() |
BrashSmurf private msg quote post Address this user | |
while yes, i agree. it is the first appearance. But collectors will disagree for some unknown reason Spider-man 2099 seems to be immune to this standard as his first appearance is a preview in a spider-man book |
||
Post 6 IP flag post |
![]() |
Darkseid_of_town private msg quote post Address this user | |
Seems odd not to accept that one but to allow DC comics presents for instance | ||
Post 7 IP flag post |
![]() |
poka private msg quote post Address this user | |
@OGJackster as mentioned previews are in general not considered first appearances | ||
Post 8 IP flag post |
![]() |
Tedsaid private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Darkseid_of_town I completely agree that previews should not count. They are an excerpt of the actual comic ... a sort of preprint. It is the actual comic that is the character's first appearance. (And here I don't mean "first appearance" as in "the first time you see the character." But rather "first appearance in a story in continuity." ) I don't know how to explain it any better than that. But it totally makes sense to me. The excerpt is just advertising for the real thing. So when the real thing comes out, that's the real first appearance, not the ad. As to Darkseid's point, why DC Comics Presents for the first appearance of The New Teen Titans, and the characters of Raven, Cyborg, and Starfire, instead of Teen Titans #1? Well, that's easy ... it wasn't an except. It was a self-contained story, one that didn't appear anywhere else. So that particular story is in continuity, and a first appearance for those characters. That was something DC was doing at the time to promote various titles ... a free "16-page comic book" insert. Besides The New Teen Titans (which was the first), they also did it for Dial 'H' for Hero, Night Force, Captain Carrot, Masters of the Universe, and Batman and the Outsiders. As far as I can tell, all of these cases were original material not found in the premiere issue that was being promoted. |
||
Post 9 IP flag post |
![]() Johnny: Under my buccan hat. |
Gotlift private msg quote post Address this user | |
I would think..... buy both and let the market sort it out. It seems these 1st appearances, cameos & previews have always been a finicky choice but the market always sets president. It’s like taking a card on 14 in Black Jack when the dealer shows a eight sometimes you win but the guy next inline will always have something to say contrary to your choice. 🤦♂️🤷🏼![]() |
||
Post 10 IP flag post |
![]() |
Drogio private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Gotlift Its cameo story vs. first full story argument! I tend to agree with @Gotlift But given all the variant/incentive covers on SA1, it’s hard to see any real spec value in that book. Unless you’re going to invest in the high ratio variants I’d stick to MM 15 as moderate risk vs. a small investment. Especially given a smaller print run (will have to see what comichron reports for # ordered). ASM365/SM2099 is one example which trends in favor of the comic with the preview. What others specific comics with bonus previews vs. first full story are out there for comparison? |
||
Post 11 IP flag post |
![]() |
GanaSoth private msg quote post Address this user | |
What about Ravencroft #1 ? It's got the Strange Academy preview in it as well. ![]() |
||
Post 12 IP flag post |
![]() |
Drogio private msg quote post Address this user | |
@GanaSoth that’s another factor in all this. If multiple/every comic in a particular month has a preview it’s like how variant covers kill spec value. Collectors want “the one comic” that stands out above all, ideally. Variants tend to confuse, dilute and discourage that mentality. I wasn’t aware of the Preview in Ravencroft. Were there others that had this preview that same week? So given that info, I would (if I were looking to invest) tend to steer away from MM15 and RC1, and invest in a convention, high incentive ratio, Or a character specific variant cover for SA1. Thanks to @GanaSoth for pointing this out. |
||
Post 13 IP flag post |
![]() |
KatKomics private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by dielinfinite Ahh...but this book far outpaces the value of New Teen Titans #1!! ![]() |
||
Post 14 IP flag post |
![]() |
poka private msg quote post Address this user | |
@KatKomics because it is not a preview but an intro. by preview means that the precise same pages are being printed | ||
Post 15 IP flag post |
![]() |
Tedsaid private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Drogio I know Thor #2 had it also. And it looks like Marvel released it digitally as well. Here is the CBR page from December. Also, I don't think Marvel knows (or cares) what "exclusive" means. ![]() |
||
Post 16 IP flag post |
![]() |
KatKomics private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by poka True...forgot that it wasn't really a 'preview' |
||
Post 17 IP flag post |
![]() |
OGJackster private msg quote post Address this user | |
@GanaSoth @Tedsaid Yup, found a few more...![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Post 18 IP flag post |
![]() |
OGJackster private msg quote post Address this user | |
It seems Marvel put the preview in select comic books released, January 29, 2020 and February 5, 2020. | ||
Post 19 IP flag post |
![]() |
Jabberwookie private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by OGJackster If it helps your argument, there was a thread about how Rick Grimes actually appeared first in a preview of some other comic. But, I agree with the others here. Previews don't seem to carry the same clout, for whatever reason. Now don't get me started on cameos, etc... |
||
Post 20 IP flag post |
Pages:
1This topic is archived. Start new topic?