X-Men #1206418
 Forum Crier
|
OGJackster private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Today Kevin Smith stated that he thinks Alpha Flight should be the next boundary-pushing team to have a movie made about them. For speculators, keep an eye out on X-Men #120, first appearance and #121 first full appearance.  |
||
| Post 1 • IP flag post | ||
 Collector
|
DocBrown private msg quote post Address this user | |
| What...? Alpha Flight, you say....? | ||
| Post 2 • IP flag post | ||
 Collector
|
KingNampa private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Nice 9.8, cheap price of $3k. Ebay |
||
| Post 3 • IP flag post | ||
|
Forum Crier
|
OGJackster private msg quote post Address this user | |
clickable text Around the 3:30 mark. |
||
| Post 4 • IP flag post | ||
|
Collector
|
DocBrown private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Comicons are for nerds. I'll be in line for Snyder & Capullo tomorrow morning in Phx. |
||
| Post 5 • IP flag post | ||
 Collector
|
Marximus private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Man, they got it all wrong. It's all about Wonder Man. Remember, you saw it here 1st. |
||
| Post 6 • IP flag post | ||
 Collector
|
GanaSoth private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Marximus Yeah, Wonder Man and Sentry are next. @OGJackster He only brought up Alpha Flight cause he is in B.C. |
||
| Post 7 • IP flag post | ||
 Captain Corrector
|
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @OGJackster Quote: Originally Posted by OGJackster Another instance of First Cameo (X-Men #120) currently worth more than First Full Appearance (X-Men #121) |
||
| Post 8 • IP flag post | ||
 Collector
|
Drogio private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck What's another example? I can't think of any. |
||
| Post 9 • IP flag post | ||
|
Collector
|
GanaSoth private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Drogio I cant think of any either. Normally first full appearances cost more. Examples: Cable (New Mutants 87) Cameo in 86 Wolverine (Incredible Hulk 181) Cameo 180 Venom (Amazing Spider-Man 300) Cameo 299 Carnage (Amazing Spider-Man 361) Cameo 360 |
||
| Post 10 • IP flag post | ||
 I live in RI and Rhode Islanders eat chili with beans.
|
esaravo private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Drogio How about Darkseid? His first full appearance is in Forever People #1, but he had cameo appearances in Superman’s Pal Jimmy Olsen #134 and #135. The first cameo appearance is worth more than the full appearance, even with that appearance coming in a first issue. |
||
| Post 11 • IP flag post | ||
|
Captain Corrector
|
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Drogio Quote: Originally Posted by Drogio @GanaSoth Quote: Originally Posted by GanaSoth I was thinking Superman’s Pal Jimmy Olsen #134 and Forever People #1, as @esaravo mentioned. Another X-Men example is Uncanny X-Men #282 (First Bishop Cameo) and Uncanny X-Men #283 (First Full Appearance of Bishop). |
||
| Post 12 • IP flag post | ||
|
Captain Corrector
|
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Another example is Eternal Warrior #4 (First Cameo Appearance of Bloodshot) and Rai #0 (First Full Appearance of Bloodshot) |
||
| Post 13 • IP flag post | ||
 I bought a meat grinder on amazon for $60 and it's changed my life.
|
kaptainmyke private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Alpha Flight would never happen. I wouldn't hold my breath. | ||
| Post 14 • IP flag post | ||
 Collector
|
thelastbard private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck Multiple reasons for Uncanny #282 being worth what it is... First Blue Team or Gold Team (whichever it was in the issue), first Whilce Portacio in X-Men, different creative team in general (including Byrne plotting), and Bishop cameo. Pretty stacked issue. Bishop first appearance in #283 doesn't quite match that. |
||
| Post 15 • IP flag post | ||
|
Collector
|
Drogio private msg quote post Address this user | |
| sometimes when a character makes several appearances as cameos, the first full appearance becomes not as significant. I think this is the case with Jason Todd (Batman 357). One frame, didn't even call him by first name. The scene was barely even part of the story. As cameo as it gets. Next few appearances I believe we're also cameos in 'Tec and Batman. Not even sure what his first technically "full" appearance is. But Batman 357 is considered the "key" first Jason Todd. |
||
| Post 16 • IP flag post | ||
 Beaten by boat oars
|
Studley_Dudley private msg quote post Address this user | |
| UXM 281 was the split into Blue/Gold teams after the original lineup came back into the fold. 282 names Bishop in the cover in majestic, generic pose. That's the only reason I can think of it being more valued. 283 may be the first full appearance, but my lowly opinion is that the cover for 282 is the selling point. | ||
| Post 17 • IP flag post | ||
|
Collector
|
Drogio private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Don't forget Dark Nights metal #2 (BWL cameo, first appearance by timeline/storyline) and TT12 (first full appearance). | ||
| Post 18 • IP flag post | ||
 Moderator
|
Jesse_O private msg quote post Address this user | |
I'd really like someone to explain to me why they would consider 120 a "cameo" appearance. The first two pages of the book names the team and shows every member of the team!!! These aren't flashbacks, them appearing in the background or remaining unnamed instances. CGC calls it the first appearance. CBCS calls it the first appearance. I haven't checked Overstreet. Comic Vine says it is the first appearance. It seems to be generally accepted as the first appearance. How do you classify it as a cameo??  |
||
| Post 19 • IP flag post | ||
|
Collector
|
thelastbard private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Drogio Good one. | ||
| Post 20 • IP flag post | ||
|
Forum Crier
|
OGJackster private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Jesse_O Here it is...  |
||
| Post 21 • IP flag post | ||
 Collector
|
Redshade private msg quote post Address this user | |
Wow! Does this mean I'm a millionaire now?   |
||
| Post 22 • IP flag post | ||
|
Moderator
|
Jesse_O private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @OGJackster Thanks!!! So, Overstreet says #120 is the first appearance also. That seems to nail it down for me. | ||
| Post 23 • IP flag post | ||
 Collector
|
doog private msg quote post Address this user | |
| I’ll get 120 graded too then. Being a Canadian movie, there will have to be beer, snow and hockey prominently featured. Or maybe a curling angle! | ||
| Post 24 • IP flag post | ||
|
Captain Corrector
|
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Drogio Quote: Originally Posted by Drogio Shouldn’t have doubted yourself, you did just fine lol |
||
| Post 25 • IP flag post | ||
|
Captain Corrector
|
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Jesse_O Quote: Originally Posted by Jesse_O Huh, CGC calls it first appearance? No, they don’t. According to CGC, X-Men #120 is the “1st Appearance of Alpha Flight in Cameo”.   |
||
| Post 26 • IP flag post | ||
|
Collector
|
Redshade private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck If you look at my #120 CBCS in post #22 above, it says : 1st appearance of Alpha Flight. Sunfire and Mariko Yashido appearance. |
||
| Post 27 • IP flag post | ||
|
Captain Corrector
|
CaptainCanuck private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Redshade Those are not CGC. |
||
| Post 28 • IP flag post | ||
|
Collector
|
Redshade private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by CaptainCanuck I know. The CBCS logo is clear in the photo. I have amended my text. |
||
| Post 29 • IP flag post | ||
|
Moderator
|
Jesse_O private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Now I see where the confusion is. CGC messed it up!!! And I obviously misread the label. | ||
| Post 30 • IP flag post | ||
Thread locked. No more posts permitted. Return home.